rs147155126
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000521.4(HEXB):c.214C>T(p.Leu72Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0101 in 1,611,790 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 113 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000521.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEXB | NM_000521.4 | c.214C>T | p.Leu72Phe | missense_variant | 1/14 | ENST00000261416.12 | NP_000512.2 | |
HEXB | NM_001292004.2 | c.-376-3854C>T | intron_variant | NP_001278933.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEXB | ENST00000261416.12 | c.214C>T | p.Leu72Phe | missense_variant | 1/14 | 1 | NM_000521.4 | ENSP00000261416.7 | ||
HEXB | ENST00000511181.5 | c.-376-3854C>T | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000426285.1 | |||||
HEXB | ENST00000513079.5 | n.279C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/6 | 2 | |||||
HEXB | ENST00000515528.1 | n.269C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/2 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00764 AC: 1160AN: 151848Hom.: 4 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00776 AC: 1903AN: 245082Hom.: 16 AF XY: 0.00791 AC XY: 1056AN XY: 133488
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0103 AC: 15074AN: 1459824Hom.: 109 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0102 AC XY: 7431AN XY: 726230
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00763 AC: 1160AN: 151966Hom.: 4 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00746 AC XY: 554AN XY: 74266
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | HEXB: BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 23, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Feb 17, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 25, 2019 | - - |
Sandhoff disease Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Dec 04, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 01, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 22, 2016 | - - |
HEXB-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 15, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at