rs147193304

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_152641.4(ARID2):​c.2579A>G​(p.Asn860Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000198 in 1,613,974 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N860D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ARID2
NM_152641.4 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

not provided no classification provided O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.78

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ARID2 (HGNC:18037): (AT-rich interaction domain 2) This gene encodes a member of the AT-rich interactive domain (ARID)-containing family of DNA-binding proteins. Members of the ARID family have roles in embryonic patterning, cell lineage gene regulation, cell cycle control, transcriptional regulation and chromatin structure modification. This protein functions as a subunit of the polybromo- and BRG1-associated factor or PBAF (SWI/SNF-B) chromatin remodeling complex which facilitates ligand-dependent transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors. Mutations in this gene are associated with hepatocellular carcinomas. A pseudogene of this gene is found on chromosome1. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]
ARID2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Coffin-Siris syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Illumina, Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Coffin-Siris syndrome 6
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.103184015).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000212 (31/1461836) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.0000447 (2/44724). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000154. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 14 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 31 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ARID2NM_152641.4 linkc.2579A>G p.Asn860Ser missense_variant Exon 15 of 21 ENST00000334344.11 NP_689854.2
ARID2NM_001347839.2 linkc.2579A>G p.Asn860Ser missense_variant Exon 15 of 20 NP_001334768.1
ARID2XM_047428489.1 linkc.2579A>G p.Asn860Ser missense_variant Exon 15 of 17 XP_047284445.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ARID2ENST00000334344.11 linkc.2579A>G p.Asn860Ser missense_variant Exon 15 of 21 1 NM_152641.4 ENSP00000335044.6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152138
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000199
AC:
5
AN:
251118
AF XY:
0.0000147
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000212
AC:
31
AN:
1461836
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000193
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
727218
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000447
AC:
2
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000225
AC:
25
AN:
1111970
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000331
AC:
2
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.517
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
7
9
11
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152138
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74336
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41434
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15264
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2090
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.375
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: not provided
Submissions summary: Other:1
Revision: no classification provided
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Other:1
Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.015
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.41
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.19
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.88
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.83
T;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0060
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.10
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.90
L;.;.
PhyloP100
1.8
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.28
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.064
Sift
Benign
0.071
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.69
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0020
B;.;B
Vest4
0.16
MutPred
0.41
Gain of catalytic residue at V862 (P = 0);.;.;
MVP
0.44
MPC
0.097
ClinPred
0.026
T
GERP RS
4.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.033
gMVP
0.29
Mutation Taster
=87/13
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147193304; hg19: chr12-46244485; COSMIC: COSV57598412; API