rs147371999

Positions:

chr12-88118708-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.1558T>C(p.Phe520Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,612,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0055 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00056 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.97

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CEP290 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0077140927).

BP6

Variant 12-88118708-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88118708-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 261827.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr12-88118708-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-88118708-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00546 (831/152310) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0187 (778/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0176. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 379 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1558T>C	p.Phe520Leu	missense_variant	16/54	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1558T>C	p.Phe520Leu	missense_variant	16/54	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00545

AC:

830

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0187

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00242

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00147

AC:

365

AN:

248246

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00108

AC XY:

146

AN XY:

134644

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0196

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00125

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000151

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000332

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000564

AC:

824

AN:

1460628

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000479

AC XY:

348

AN XY:

726548

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0183

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000648

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00124

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00546

AC:

831

AN:

152310

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00509

AC XY:

379

AN XY:

74470

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0187

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00242

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.00109

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00652

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0189

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00172

AC:

208

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3474

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 23, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Mar 14, 2016	- -

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Oct 16, 2023	- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

Senior-Loken syndrome 6

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 31, 2024

- -

Joubert syndrome 5

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.74

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.16

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.010

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.23

.;T;T;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.24

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.38

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Benign

0.80

T;T;T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0077

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.88

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

.;M;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

D;D;D

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.75

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

N;N;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.21

Sift

Uncertain

0.024

D;D;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.075

T;D;T;T

Polyphen

0.94

.;P;.;.

Vest4

0.73

MutPred

0.34

Gain of catalytic residue at F520 (P = 0.0286);Gain of catalytic residue at F520 (P = 0.0286);.;Gain of catalytic residue at F520 (P = 0.0286);

MVP

0.62

MPC

0.15

ClinPred

0.024

GERP RS

5.8

Varity_R

0.22

gMVP

0.30

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over