rs147447269

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_002474.3(MYH11):​c.217A>C​(p.Lys73Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000185 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00021 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00018 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MYH11
NM_002474.3 missense

Scores

7
8
4

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.26
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH11 (HGNC:7569): (myosin heavy chain 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a smooth muscle myosin belonging to the myosin heavy chain family. The gene product is a subunit of a hexameric protein that consists of two heavy chain subunits and two pairs of non-identical light chain subunits. It functions as a major contractile protein, converting chemical energy into mechanical energy through the hydrolysis of ATP. A chromosomal rearrangement involving this gene is associated with acute myeloid leukemia of the M4Eo subtype. Mutations in this gene are associated with visceral myopathy, megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome 2, and familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 4. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.036459357).
BP6
Variant 16-15838036-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-15838036-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 201095.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000211 (32/152014) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000132 (9/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000681. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 16 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH11NM_002474.3 linkc.217A>C p.Lys73Gln missense_variant Exon 2 of 41 ENST00000300036.6 NP_002465.1 P35749-1A0A024QZJ4
MYH11NM_001040113.2 linkc.217A>C p.Lys73Gln missense_variant Exon 2 of 43 ENST00000452625.7 NP_001035202.1 P35749-3
MYH11NM_001040114.2 linkc.217A>C p.Lys73Gln missense_variant Exon 2 of 42 NP_001035203.1 P35749-2
MYH11NM_022844.3 linkc.217A>C p.Lys73Gln missense_variant Exon 2 of 42 NP_074035.1 P35749-4A0A024QZJ6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH11ENST00000300036.6 linkc.217A>C p.Lys73Gln missense_variant Exon 2 of 41 1 NM_002474.3 ENSP00000300036.5 P35749-1
MYH11ENST00000452625.7 linkc.217A>C p.Lys73Gln missense_variant Exon 2 of 43 1 NM_001040113.2 ENSP00000407821.2 P35749-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000211
AC:
32
AN:
152014
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00663
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000310
AC:
78
AN:
251492
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000346
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
135920
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00546
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000149
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000651
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000183
AC:
267
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000165
AC XY:
120
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00566
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000764
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000211
AC:
32
AN:
152014
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000216
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00663
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000396
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000230
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000255
AC:
31
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4
Feb 07, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The MYH11 c.217A>C; p.Lys73Gln variant (rs147447269), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 201095). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.0283% (80/282,844 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. Computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.688). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. -

Feb 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

MYH11: PP3 -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:2
Apr 28, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Connective tissue disorder Uncertain:1
Jun 01, 2018
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Feb 15, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

MYH11-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 20, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.24
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.013
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.0
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.68
.;.;.;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.85
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.82
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.53
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.036
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.71
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
M;M;M;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.71
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.4
N;N;.;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.69
Sift
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.014
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.98
.;.;.;D
Vest4
0.35
MVP
0.86
MPC
1.9
ClinPred
0.22
T
GERP RS
5.8
Varity_R
0.40
gMVP
0.64

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147447269; hg19: chr16-15931893; API