Menu
GeneBe

rs147458358

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.9754A>G(p.Asn3252Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00184 in 1,614,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N3252S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 missense

Scores

1
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.868
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0043999553).
BP6
Variant 17-18163805-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18163805-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 164566.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=5, Benign=4}. Variant chr17-18163805-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00183 (2676/1461754) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0205 (118/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0175. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1407 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.9754A>G p.Asn3252Asp missense_variant 60/66 ENST00000647165.2
MYO15AXM_017024715.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.9757A>G p.Asn3253Asp missense_variant 58/64
MYO15AXM_017024714.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.9694A>G p.Asn3232Asp missense_variant 57/63

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.9754A>G p.Asn3252Asp missense_variant 60/66 NM_016239.4 P1Q9UKN7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00191
AC:
290
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00281
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00778
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00310
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00242
AC:
603
AN:
249064
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00274
AC XY:
371
AN XY:
135158
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000388
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00835
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00400
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00256
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00710
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00183
AC:
2676
AN:
1461754
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00193
AC XY:
1407
AN XY:
727152
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000717
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00880
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00380
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00153
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00316
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00191
AC:
291
AN:
152320
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00197
AC XY:
147
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000433
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00281
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00778
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00426
Alfa
AF:
0.00295
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00243
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00162
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00259
AC:
10
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000246
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00298
AC:
25
ExAC
AF:
0.00235
AC:
284
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00398
EpiControl
AF:
0.00374

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsAug 24, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 30, 2012Asn3252Asp in Exon 60 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.4% (26/6804) of European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs147458358). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 14, 2016- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024MYO15A: BP4, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 22, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 28, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJan 01, 2019- -
MYO15A-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 17, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 07, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.051
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.42
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
Cadd
Benign
0.15
Dann
Benign
0.87
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0029
T;T;T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.7
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0074
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.20
T;.;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.047
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0044
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.23
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;.;T;.;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.23
MVP
0.38
ClinPred
0.0061
T
GERP RS
-2.5
Varity_R
0.058
gMVP
0.38

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147458358; hg19: chr17-18067119; COSMIC: COSV99068560; COSMIC: COSV99068560; API