rs147463420

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_005445.4(SMC3):​c.2934G>A​(p.Lys978Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00181 in 1,613,688 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

SMC3
NM_005445.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.26
Variant links:
Genes affected
SMC3 (HGNC:2468): (structural maintenance of chromosomes 3) This gene belongs to the SMC3 subfamily of SMC proteins. The encoded protein occurs in certain cell types as either an intracellular, nuclear protein or a secreted protein. The nuclear form, known as structural maintenance of chromosomes 3, is a component of the multimeric cohesin complex that holds together sister chromatids during mitosis, enabling proper chromosome segregation. Post-translational modification of the encoded protein by the addition of chondroitin sulfate chains gives rise to the secreted proteoglycan bamacan, an abundant basement membrane protein. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 10-110602007-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110602007-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 159983.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.26 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00133 (202/152294) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00301 (46/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00232. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 107 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 202 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SMC3NM_005445.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2934G>A p.Lys978Lys synonymous_variant 25/29 ENST00000361804.5 NP_005436.1 Q9UQE7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SMC3ENST00000361804.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2934G>A p.Lys978Lys synonymous_variant 25/291 NM_005445.4 ENSP00000354720.5 Q9UQE7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00133
AC:
202
AN:
152176
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00110
AC:
277
AN:
250976
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00113
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
135832
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000186
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00186
AC:
2711
AN:
1461394
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00183
AC XY:
1328
AN XY:
726984
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000536
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000637
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00221
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00154
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00133
AC:
202
AN:
152294
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00144
AC XY:
107
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00179
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00136
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00185
EpiControl
AF:
0.00237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cornelia de Lange syndrome 3 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 10, 2024- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 15, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 29, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 31, 2017This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024SMC3: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
5.0
DANN
Benign
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147463420; hg19: chr10-112361765; API