rs147479514

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.2204-7C>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.011 in 1,589,644 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 136 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0091 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.011 ( 124 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.003871
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0540
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 1-237500704-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237500704-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 36738.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-237500704-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-237500704-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00914 (1391/152250) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0132 (896/67996). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0125. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 717 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1391 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RYR2NM_001035.3 linkc.2204-7C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 20 of 104 ENST00000366574.7 NP_001026.2 Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR2ENST00000366574.7 linkc.2204-7C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 20 of 104 1 NM_001035.3 ENSP00000355533.2 Q92736-1
RYR2ENST00000609119.2 linkn.2204-7C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 20 of 103 5 ENSP00000499659.2 A0A590UK06
RYR2ENST00000660292.2 linkc.2204-7C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 20 of 105 ENSP00000499787.2 A0A590UKB7
RYR2ENST00000659194.3 linkc.2204-7C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 20 of 104 ENSP00000499653.3 A0A590UJZ8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00914
AC:
1391
AN:
152132
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0482
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00426
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0274
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00525
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00959
AC:
2307
AN:
240644
Hom.:
20
AF XY:
0.00962
AC XY:
1253
AN XY:
130236
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000107
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00550
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0273
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0123
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0133
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0112
AC:
16137
AN:
1437394
Hom.:
124
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0110
AC XY:
7847
AN XY:
711204
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00387
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000509
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00563
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0281
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0108
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00914
AC:
1391
AN:
152250
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00963
AC XY:
717
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00425
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0274
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00520
Alfa
AF:
0.0115
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00734
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

RYR2: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified Benign:4
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 03, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

2204-7C>G in intron 20 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it is not located within the splice consensus sequence and ha s been identified in 1.2% (78/6636) of European American chromosomes and 3/3058 African American chromosomes from a broad, though clinically unspecified populat ion (dbSNP rs147479514, NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project; http://evs.gs.washington .edu/EVS). 2204-7C>G in intron 20 of RYR2 (rs147479514, NHLBI Exome Seq Project ; 1.2%,78/6636) -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:3
Jul 17, 2017
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 09, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 15, 2013
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 08, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
2.4
DANN
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0039
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.10
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147479514; hg19: chr1-237664004; API