rs147528229
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 3P and 20B. PM1PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_002067.5(GNA11):c.193G>A(p.Ala65Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00092 in 1,613,616 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A65A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002067.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant hypocalcemia 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- congenital hemangiomaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- autosomal dominant hypocalcemiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00506 AC: 770AN: 152076Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00127 AC: 318AN: 249994 AF XY: 0.000952 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000489 AC: 714AN: 1461422Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000406 AC XY: 295AN XY: 727014 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00506 AC: 770AN: 152194Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00500 AC XY: 372AN XY: 74396 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
not specified Other:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at