rs147549623
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.7514G>A(p.Arg2505Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00128 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00094 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
APC
NM_000038.6 missense
NM_000038.6 missense
Scores
1
9
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.99
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.12488851).
BP6
Variant 5-112843108-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112843108-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 127319.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-112843108-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr5-112843108-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00131 (1917/1461732) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0016 (1784/1111886). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00154. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 944 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 143 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.7514G>A | p.Arg2505Gln | missense_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000257430.9 | NP_000029.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.7514G>A | p.Arg2505Gln | missense_variant | 16/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430.4 | ||
ENSG00000258864 | ENST00000520401.1 | n.229-13541G>A | intron_variant | 3 | ENSP00000454861.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000940 AC: 143AN: 152134Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
143
AN:
152134
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000824 AC: 207AN: 251232Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000877 AC XY: 119AN XY: 135766
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
207
AN:
251232
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
119
AN XY:
135766
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00131 AC: 1917AN: 1461732Hom.: 6 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00130 AC XY: 944AN XY: 727162
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1917
AN:
1461732
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
944
AN XY:
727162
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000939 AC: 143AN: 152252Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000900 AC XY: 67AN XY: 74452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
143
AN:
152252
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
67
AN XY:
74452
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
13
ExAC
AF:
AC:
99
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:12
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 20, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 14, 2016 | Variant summary: The APC c.7514G>A variant affects a conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Arg to Gln. 2/4 in-silico tools predict this variant to be benign (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 102/125206 control chromosomes (1 homozygote) at a frequency of 0.0008147, which is about 14 times the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic APC allele (0.0000602), suggesting this variant is benign. Thie variant has been reported in patients with MAP/FAP, CRC or pancreatic cancer. In one CRC family, this variant did not co-segregate with the disease (Zhou_2004), highly suggesting this variant is not causative. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Nov 01, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Arg2505Gln variant was identified in 4 of 2376 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals with colorectal adenomas or colorectal cancer (Azzopardi 2008, Lefevre 2012, Zhou 2004) and was present in 2 of 3862 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.001). The variant was also listed at a frequency of 0.001 in the “NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project”, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. In a study by Zhou (2004), the variant was found incidentally in two members of a family with hereditary colorectal cancer but did not segregate with disease in other affected family members. The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs147549623) and the “InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database”, but was not identified in other databases searched, including HGMD, UMD and COSMIC. The p.Arg2505 residue is conserved in mammals and lower organisms; however, computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact of the variant amino acid to the protein and this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Additional study is needed to determine the clinical significance of this variant. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | APC: BS1 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 30, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 20, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Jul 31, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 15, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 31, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Apr 16, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 19, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 09, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed in conjunction with multiple pathogenic variants, reducing the likelihood this variant itself is pathogenic. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 26, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
D;D
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at