rs147579680
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Moderate
The NM_173812.5(DPY19L2):c.869G>C(p.Arg290Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R290H) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173812.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- spermatogenic failure 9Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- male infertility due to globozoospermiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPY19L2 | ENST00000324472.9 | c.869G>C | p.Arg290Pro | missense_variant | Exon 8 of 22 | 1 | NM_173812.5 | ENSP00000315988.4 | ||
| DPY19L2 | ENST00000306389.7 | n.*344+2345G>C | intron_variant | Intron 6 of 13 | 1 | ENSP00000445878.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000249753 | ENST00000509615.2 | n.239-300G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.869G>C (p.R290P) alteration is located in exon 8 (coding exon 8) of the DPY19L2 gene. This alteration results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 869, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 290 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at