rs147579870

chr19-10775845-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7

The NM_001005361.3(DNM2):c.528C>T(p.Pro176=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000954 in 1,613,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000090 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: DNM2 NM_001005361.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -7.82

Genes affected

DNM2 (HGNC:2974): (dynamin 2) Dynamins represent one of the subfamilies of GTP-binding proteins. These proteins share considerable sequence similarity over the N-terminal portion of the molecule, which contains the GTPase domain. Dynamins are associated with microtubules. They have been implicated in cell processes such as endocytosis and cell motility, and in alterations of the membrane that accompany certain activities such as bone resorption by osteoclasts. Dynamins bind many proteins that bind actin and other cytoskeletal proteins. Dynamins can also self-assemble, a process that stimulates GTPase activity. Five alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different proteins have been described. Additional alternatively spliced transcripts may exist, but their full-length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
• BP6: Variant 19-10775845-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10775845-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 327975.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-7.82 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DNM2	NM_001005361.3	c.528C>T	p.Pro176=	synonymous_variant	4/21	ENST00000389253.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DNM2	ENST00000389253.9	c.528C>T	p.Pro176=	synonymous_variant	4/21	5	NM_001005361.3	A1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22 AN: 152148 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000966

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000459

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000192

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000132

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000919 AC: 23 AN: 250300 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000813 AC XY: 11 AN XY: 135334

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000124

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000203

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000598

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000266

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000903 AC: 132 AN: 1461682 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000963 AC XY: 70 AN XY: 727158

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000157

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000176

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000971

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000132

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000144 AC: 22 AN: 152266 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10 AN XY: 74450

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000963

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000458

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.0000387 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000159

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Dec 04, 2023	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 11, 2019

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Athena Diagnostics

Dec 04, 2018

- -

DNM2-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Feb 27, 2023

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.69
Cadd	Benign	0.15
Dann	Benign	0.80
RBP_binding_hub_radar		1.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		2.8

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147579870; hg19: chr19-10886521;