rs147841606

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency (the lower threshold of the 95% CI of 44/24026) of the c.429A>G (p.Pro143=) variant in the COCH gene is 0.14% for African chromosomes by gnomAD, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA7143032/MONDO:0019497/005

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00051 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

COCH
NM_004086.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0350

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COCH (HGNC:2180): (cochlin) The protein encoded by this gene is highly conserved in human, mouse, and chicken, showing 94% and 79% amino acid identity of human to mouse and chicken sequences, respectively. Hybridization to this gene was detected in spindle-shaped cells located along nerve fibers between the auditory ganglion and sensory epithelium. These cells accompany neurites at the habenula perforata, the opening through which neurites extend to innervate hair cells. This and the pattern of expression of this gene in chicken inner ear paralleled the histologic findings of acidophilic deposits, consistent with mucopolysaccharide ground substance, in temporal bones from DFNA9 (autosomal dominant nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness 9) patients. Mutations that cause DFNA9 have been reported in this gene. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding the same protein. Additional splice variants encoding distinct isoforms have been described but their biological validities have not been demonstrated. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

COCH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 9
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hearing loss, autosomal recessive 110
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

COCH links:

ENSG00000258525 (HGNC:58454):

ENSG00000258525 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BA1

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COCH	NM_004086.3 link	c.429A>G	p.Pro143Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 12	ENST00000396618.9	NP_004077.1	O43405-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COCH	ENST00000396618.9 link	c.429A>G	p.Pro143Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 12	1	NM_004086.3	ENSP00000379862.3		O43405-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000506

AC:

AN:

152232

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

251478

AF XY:

0.000103

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00142

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000493

AC:

AN:

1461780

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000481

AC XY:

AN XY:

727192

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00125

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000335

AC:

AN:

44716

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39692

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1111944

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000215

AC:

AN:

60384

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.455

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000512

AC:

AN:

152350

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000550

AC XY:

AN XY:

74516

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00156

AC:

AN:

41578

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000392

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.512

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000430

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000544

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Apr 17, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

May 14, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Pro143Pro in exon 06 of COCH: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.1% (11/10382) of A frican chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadi nstitute.org; dbSNP rs147841606). -

Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss

Benign:1

Mar 25, 2019

ClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance:Benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency (the lower threshold of the 95% CI of 44/24026) of the c.429A>G (p.Pro143=) variant in the COCH gene is 0.14% for African chromosomes by gnomAD, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 9

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

9.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.78

PhyloP100

-0.035

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over