Menu
GeneBe

rs147863331

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):c.1825G>A(p.Val609Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000159 in 1,614,140 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V609A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00088 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000084 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 missense

Scores

3
6
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.60
Variant links:
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM1
In a repeat ARM 4 (size 46) in uniprot entity APC_HUMAN there are 7 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (88%) in NM_000038.6
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015657783).
BP6
Variant 5-112835032-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112835032-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127278.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00088 (134/152316) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00313 (130/41574). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00269. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 58 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 134 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
APCNM_000038.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1825G>A p.Val609Ile missense_variant 15/16 ENST00000257430.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
APCENST00000257430.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1825G>A p.Val609Ile missense_variant 15/165 NM_000038.6 P1P25054-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000880
AC:
134
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000259
AC:
65
AN:
251294
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000162
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
135806
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00394
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000841
AC:
123
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000660
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
727216
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00338
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000994
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000880
AC:
134
AN:
152316
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000779
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000202
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00103
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00363
AC:
16
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000362
AC:
44

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 30, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 21, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024APC: BS1 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 01, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23159591, 25980754, 22585170, 26802149, 27978560, 28135145, 28873162, 26667234) -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Feb 22, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 18, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 22, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 07, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 03, 2020- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 19, 2018Variant summary: APC c.1825G>A (p.Val609Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Armadillo of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0003 in 277028 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 4.19 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in APC causing Familial Adenomatous Polyposis phenotype (7.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1825G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with colorectal cancer, Lynch syndrome, breast cancer, and other unspecified phenotypes (Kerr_2013, Liang_2016, Pearlman_2016, Yurgelun_2017, Yurgelun_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (TP53 c.742C>T, p.Arg248Trp; APC c.3927_3931delAAAGA, p.Glu1309fsX4, internal testing), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The APC p.Val609Ile variant was identified in 5 of 8718 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0006) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer (Kerr 2012, Pearlman 2017, Yurgelun 2015, Yurgelun 2017). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs147863331) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics and three other submitters; as uncertain significance by Counsyl), and in LOVD 3.0 (1x as VUS). The variant was not identified in UMD-LSDB. The variant was identified in control databases in 83 of 277028 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the African population in 83 of 24034 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), while the variant was not observed in the Other, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The variant was identified in our laboratory with a co-occurring pathogenic APC variant (c.4391_4394del, p.Glu1464Valfs*8), increasing the likelihood that the p.Val609Ile variant does not have clinical significance. The p.Val609 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
Cadd
Pathogenic
28
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.97
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.95
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.97
D;.;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.036
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.016
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.0079
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.77
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.90
N;N;N;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.38
Sift
Benign
0.034
D;D;D;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.99
.;D;D;.;.
Vest4
0.67, 0.55
MVP
0.78
ClinPred
0.16
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.61
gMVP
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147863331; hg19: chr5-112170729; COSMIC: COSV57347683; API