rs147896322
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 1P and 18B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000719.7(CACNA1C):c.5119G>A(p.Val1707Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000212 in 1,591,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
CACNA1C
NM_000719.7 missense
NM_000719.7 missense
Scores
1
9
7
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.30
Genes affected
CACNA1C (HGNC:1390): (calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 C) This gene encodes an alpha-1 subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel. Calcium channels mediate the influx of calcium ions into the cell upon membrane polarization. The alpha-1 subunit consists of 24 transmembrane segments and forms the pore through which ions pass into the cell. The calcium channel consists of a complex of alpha-1, alpha-2/delta, beta, and gamma subunits in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. There are multiple isoforms of each of these proteins, either encoded by different genes or the result of alternative splicing of transcripts. The protein encoded by this gene binds to and is inhibited by dihydropyridine. Alternative splicing results in many transcript variants encoding different proteins. Some of the predicted proteins may not produce functional ion channel subunits. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), CACNA1C. . Gene score misZ 6.4654 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 7.2674 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with intellectual disability, neurodevelopmental disorder with hypotonia, language delay, and skeletal defects with or without seizures, Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome, long qt syndrome 8, Timothy syndrome, Brugada syndrome 3.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15100849).
BP6
Variant 12-2679471-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-2679471-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 190621.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-2679471-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000215 (309/1438778) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00511 (29/5670). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00366. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 176 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 28 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1C | NM_000719.7 | c.5119G>A | p.Val1707Ile | missense_variant | 42/47 | ENST00000399655.6 | NP_000710.5 | |
CACNA1C | NM_001167623.2 | c.5119G>A | p.Val1707Ile | missense_variant | 42/47 | ENST00000399603.6 | NP_001161095.1 | |
CACNA1C-AS1 | NR_045725.1 | n.334-1574C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1C | ENST00000399603.6 | c.5119G>A | p.Val1707Ile | missense_variant | 42/47 | 5 | NM_001167623.2 | ENSP00000382512 | ||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399655.6 | c.5119G>A | p.Val1707Ile | missense_variant | 42/47 | 1 | NM_000719.7 | ENSP00000382563 | ||
CACNA1C-AS1 | ENST00000501371.5 | n.295-1574C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
152106
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000267 AC: 60AN: 224776Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000312 AC XY: 38AN XY: 121698
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
60
AN:
224776
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
121698
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000215 AC: 309AN: 1438778Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000247 AC XY: 176AN XY: 712844
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
309
AN:
1438778
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
176
AN XY:
712844
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74414
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74414
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
36
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | CACNA1C: BS1 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 23, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 10, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;.;.;T;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
1.0, 0.33, 0.33, 0.14, 1.0, 0.35, 1.0, 0.99
.;D;B;B;B;D;D;D;B;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;.;.;.;D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.43
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at