rs147900972
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.11404G>A(p.Glu3802Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00175 in 1,596,618 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). The gene USH2A is included in the ClinGen Criteria Specification Registry.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Usher syndrome type 2AInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Usher syndrome type 2Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosa 39Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00162 AC: 234AN: 144234Hom.: 1 Cov.: 26 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00249 AC: 621AN: 249888 AF XY: 0.00246 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00177 AC: 2567AN: 1452288Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00182 AC XY: 1318AN XY: 722656 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00162 AC: 234AN: 144330Hom.: 1 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00189 AC XY: 132AN XY: 69886 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at