rs147925149

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1865A>G (p.Asn622Ser) missense variant has a frequency of 0.000007953 (2 of 251,480) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00006152 (1 of 16,256) in the African subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in >10 (27) individuals w/o DCG, SRC tumors, or LBC & whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000166547.6, SCV000329232.7). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA167846/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000075 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

1
10
8

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:6B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1865A>G p.Asn622Ser missense_variant 12/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1682A>G p.Asn561Ser missense_variant 11/15 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.317A>G p.Asn106Ser missense_variant 12/16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-101A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 11/15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1865A>G p.Asn622Ser missense_variant 12/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152112
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000795
AC:
2
AN:
251480
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000752
AC:
11
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000688
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000629
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152112
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:5
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalSep 09, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 28, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 25, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de InvestigaĆ§Ć£o e InovaĆ§Ć£o em SaĆŗde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022BS2 (PMID: 30311375) -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 08, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 20, 2024Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15235021, 22850631, 33471991, 36436516) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 17, 2023This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 622 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with CDH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 2/251480 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 10, 2022- -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 17, 2023The c.1865A>G (p.Asn622Ser) missense variant has a frequency of 0.000007953 (2 of 251,480) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00006152 (1 of 16,256) in the African subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in >10 (27) individuals w/o DCG, SRC tumors, or LBC & whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000166547.6, SCV000329232.7). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.24
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.054
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.32
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.51
D;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.64
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.97
D;D;T;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.064
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.32
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.28
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.7
D;.;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.32
Sift
Benign
0.032
D;.;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;T;D;T
Polyphen
0.90
P;.;.;.
Vest4
0.67
MVP
0.89
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
0.64
D
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.22
gMVP
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147925149; hg19: chr16-68856057; API