rs147925149
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1865A>G (p.Asn622Ser) missense variant has a frequency of 0.000007953 (2 of 251,480) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00006152 (1 of 16,256) in the African subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in >10 (27) individuals w/o DCG, SRC tumors, or LBC & whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000166547.6, SCV000329232.7). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA167846/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.1865A>G | p.Asn622Ser | missense_variant | 12/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1682A>G | p.Asn561Ser | missense_variant | 11/15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.317A>G | p.Asn106Ser | missense_variant | 12/16 | NP_001304114.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-101A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 11/15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.1865A>G | p.Asn622Ser | missense_variant | 12/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251480Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000752 AC: 11AN: 1461888Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74314
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Sep 09, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 06, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 25, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de InvestigaĆ§Ć£o e InovaĆ§Ć£o em SaĆŗde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BS2 (PMID: 30311375) - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 08, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 20, 2024 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15235021, 22850631, 33471991, 36436516) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 17, 2023 | This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 622 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with CDH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 2/251480 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 10, 2022 | - - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Aug 17, 2023 | The c.1865A>G (p.Asn622Ser) missense variant has a frequency of 0.000007953 (2 of 251,480) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00006152 (1 of 16,256) in the African subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in >10 (27) individuals w/o DCG, SRC tumors, or LBC & whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000166547.6, SCV000329232.7). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at