Menu
GeneBe

rs147939483

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.1182C>T(p.Arg394=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000434 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R394R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00045 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.209
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 11-32396339-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32396339-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 414080.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.209 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 39 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1182C>T p.Arg394= synonymous_variant 7/10 ENST00000452863.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1182C>T p.Arg394= synonymous_variant 7/101 NM_024426.6 P19544-7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000256
AC:
39
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000203
AC:
51
AN:
251448
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000199
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
135906
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000404
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000453
AC:
662
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000457
AC XY:
332
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000562
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000596
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000256
AC:
39
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74332
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000131
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000283
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsFeb 28, 2017- -
11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 26, 2024- -
Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
WT1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 10, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
Cadd
Benign
7.8
Dann
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147939483; hg19: chr11-32417885; API