rs147945812
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2_Supporting
The NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.3139+18C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00145 in 1,611,608 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000492.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cystic fibrosisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet
- congenital bilateral absence of vas deferensInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary chronic pancreatitisInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTR | NM_000492.4 | c.3139+18C>T | intron_variant | Intron 19 of 26 | ENST00000003084.11 | NP_000483.3 | ||
| CFTR-AS2 | NR_199597.1 | n.177+5542G>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00134 AC: 204AN: 151934Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00131 AC: 329AN: 250194 AF XY: 0.00145 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00147 AC: 2139AN: 1459556Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00147 AC XY: 1064AN XY: 726152 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00133 AC: 202AN: 152052Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00156 AC XY: 116AN XY: 74310 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cystic fibrosis Benign:3
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
the variant does not result in CFTR-RD neither -
- -
not provided Benign:3
CFTR: BS3:Supporting -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
Variant summary: The CFTR c.3139+18C>T variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 276326 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. This frequency is not higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in CFTR causing Cystic Fibrosis (0.0014 vs 0.013), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The c.3139+18C>T has been reported in the literature in an individual presented with mild Cystic Fibrosis, however this patient was compound heterozygous for two deleterious CFTR variants, c.1083delG (p.Trp361fsX8) and c.2291delG (p.Arg764fsX7), suggesting the variant of interest to be in the benign spectrum (Romey_1994). In addition, the variant was found in trans with F508del in an individual, who did not have CF (Gamaletsou_2017). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as benign. Multiple published reports cite the variant as "polymorphism" (Bombier_1998; Romey_1994; Pignatti_1995). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at