rs147949881
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_014363.6(SACS):c.6952G>A(p.Ala2318Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000331 in 1,613,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A2318V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014363.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Charlevoix-Saguenay spastic ataxiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000237 AC: 36AN: 152124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000199 AC: 50AN: 250954 AF XY: 0.000170 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000341 AC: 498AN: 1461626Hom.: 0 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.000352 AC XY: 256AN XY: 727098 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000237 AC: 36AN: 152124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 13AN XY: 74310 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Charlevoix-Saguenay spastic ataxia Uncertain:4
The missense variant p.A2318T in SACS (NM_014363.6) has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. It has been submitted to ClinVar with varying interpretations of pathogenicity- Uncertain Significance/ Likely Benign., however no details are available for independent assessment. The p.A2318T missense variant is predicted to be damaging by both SIFT and PolyPhen2. The alanine residue at codon 2318 of SACS is conserved in all mammalian species. The nucleotide c.6952 in SACS is predicted conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Uncertain Significance. -
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
- -
- -
Identified in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia in published literature, although clinical details and segregation data was not provided (PMID: 34445196); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 34445196) -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.6952G>A (p.A2318T) alteration is located in exon 10 (coding exon 9) of the SACS gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 6952, causing the alanine (A) at amino acid position 2318 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Hereditary spastic paraplegia Uncertain:1
- -
Spastic ataxia Uncertain:1
- -
Spastic paraplegia Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at