rs148123045

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001386795.1(DTNA):​c.1000G>A​(p.Val334Met) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 1,613,666 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DTNA
NM_001386795.1 missense, splice_region

Scores

4
4
10
Splicing: ADA: 0.9738
1
1

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0
Variant links:
Genes affected
DTNA (HGNC:3057): (dystrobrevin alpha) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the dystrobrevin subfamily of the dystrophin family. This protein is a component of the dystrophin-associated protein complex (DPC), which consists of dystrophin and several integral and peripheral membrane proteins, including dystroglycans, sarcoglycans, syntrophins and alpha- and beta-dystrobrevin. The DPC localizes to the sarcolemma and its disruption is associated with various forms of muscular dystrophy. Mutations in this gene are associated with left ventricular noncompaction with congenital heart defects. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00822553).
BP6
Variant 18-34820914-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-34820914-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46410.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr18-34820914-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr18-34820914-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 175 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DTNANM_001386795.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1000G>A p.Val334Met missense_variant, splice_region_variant 9/23 ENST00000444659.6 NP_001373724.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DTNAENST00000444659.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1000G>A p.Val334Met missense_variant, splice_region_variant 9/235 NM_001386795.1 ENSP00000405819 P3Q9Y4J8-17

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00114
AC:
173
AN:
151730
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00522
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000971
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000961
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000927
AC:
233
AN:
251432
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000920
AC XY:
125
AN XY:
135882
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00480
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000739
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00109
AC:
1598
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00105
AC XY:
762
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00470
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000695
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00115
AC:
175
AN:
151846
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00132
AC XY:
98
AN XY:
74210
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00121
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00522
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000971
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000951
Alfa
AF:
0.000980
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000842
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00159
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000930
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000964
AC:
117
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 02, 2016Variant summary: The variant c.1000G>A (p.Val334Ile) in DTNA gene involves a conserved nucleotide with 3/5 in silico programs predicting a "benign" outcome, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large and broad control population from ExAC with an allele frequency of 117/121378 (1/1037), which exceeds the estimated maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic DTNA variant of 1/40000. The variant of interest has been reported in individuals undergoing exome sequencing with limited information (i.e. information about co-occurrence and/or co-segregation data). In addition, multiple reputable clinical laboratories cite the variant with a classification of "uncertain significance," although it should be noted the classification evaluation occurred prior to the availablity of the ExAC dataset. Therefore, taken all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as Benign. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 28, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 18, 2012Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Val334Ile varia nt in DTNA has been previously identified in one infant with HCM (LMM unpublishe d data). This variant is present at low frequency in various cohorts, the highes t being 0.16% (7/4406) in a broad African American cohort screened by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs148123045). Computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties, conservation, AlignG VGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest that the Val334Ile variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenic ity. In summary, although these data support that the Val334Ile variant may be b enign, additional studies are needed to fully assess its clinical significance. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Left ventricular noncompaction 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 28, 2018- -
DTNA-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 28, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.41
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.040
CADD
Pathogenic
34
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
.;.;.;.;T;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.93
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.91
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D;D;.;D;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.053
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0082
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.80
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.67
N;N;.;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Benign
0.080
T;D;.;.;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.063
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.97
D;D;D;D;B;B
Vest4
0.49
MVP
0.59
ClinPred
0.060
T
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.084

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Pathogenic
0.97
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.64
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148123045; hg19: chr18-32400878; API