rs148135241

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.3364T>G(p.Ser1122Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00142 in 1,613,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 47 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S1122S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 39 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.99

Publications

16 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

USH2A links:

USH2A-AS1 (HGNC:40606): (USH2A antisense RNA 1)

USH2A-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 10 uncertain in NM_206933.4

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010767311).

BP6

Variant 1-216200074-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216200074-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 48500.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00195 (297/152182) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0489 (252/5158). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0439. There are 8 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 175 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
USH2A	NM_206933.4 link	c.3364T>G	p.Ser1122Ala	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 72	ENST00000307340.8	NP_996816.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
USH2A	ENST00000307340.8 link	c.3364T>G	p.Ser1122Ala	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 72	1	NM_206933.4	ENSP00000305941.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00195

AC:

297

AN:

152064

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00403

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0489

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00446

AC:

1118

AN:

250806

AF XY:

0.00407

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000617

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00348

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0562

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00180

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00137

AC:

2002

AN:

1461658

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00132

AC XY:

961

AN XY:

727146

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000896

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44712

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00413

AC:

108

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0403

AC:

1598

AN:

39648

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53380

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000520

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000522

AC:

AN:

1111906

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00217

AC:

131

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.493

Heterozygous variant carriers

118

235

353

470

588

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

108

144

180

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00195

AC:

297

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00235

AC XY:

175

AN XY:

74410

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000241

AC:

AN:

41518

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000262

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00403

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0489

AC:

252

AN:

5158

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00166

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10602

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000735

AC:

AN:

68006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00189

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.508

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00162

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00256

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000581

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00446

AC:

541

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0110

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Oct 02, 2019

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

USH2A: BP4, BS1, BS2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 12, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Mar 09, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ser1122Ala in Exon 17 of USH2A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 6.0% (24/394) of Asian chromosomes from the 1000 Genomes Project (dbSNP rs148135241).

Usher syndrome type 2A

Benign:2

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign.

Nov 04, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Usher syndrome type 2A;C3151138:Retinitis pigmentosa 39

Benign:1

Jan 14, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinitis pigmentosa 39

Benign:1

Nov 04, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinal dystrophy

Benign:1

Oct 01, 2023

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:research

Retinitis pigmentosa

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.095

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.29

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.14

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.092

T;.

Eigen

Benign

0.061

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.0094

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.90

LIST_S2

Benign

0.66

T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.18

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.8

M;M

PhyloP100

3.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.34

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.7

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.41

Sift

Benign

0.055

T;T

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Vest4

0.43

ClinPred

0.053

GERP RS

2.2

Varity_R

0.085

gMVP

0.40

Mutation Taster

=93/7

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over