Menu
GeneBe

rs148173473

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PM2BP4

The NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1606A>G(p.Lys536Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000174 in 1,610,426 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000019 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CFTR
NM_000492.4 missense

Scores

2
10
7

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFTR (HGNC:1884): (CF transmembrane conductance regulator) This gene encodes a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. The encoded protein functions as a chloride channel, making it unique among members of this protein family, and controls ion and water secretion and absorption in epithelial tissues. Channel activation is mediated by cycles of regulatory domain phosphorylation, ATP-binding by the nucleotide-binding domains, and ATP hydrolysis. Mutations in this gene cause cystic fibrosis, the most common lethal genetic disorder in populations of Northern European descent. The most frequently occurring mutation in cystic fibrosis, DeltaF508, results in impaired folding and trafficking of the encoded protein. Multiple pseudogenes have been identified in the human genome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 14 uncertain in NM_000492.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.39503706).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CFTRNM_000492.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1606A>G p.Lys536Glu missense_variant 12/27 ENST00000003084.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CFTRENST00000003084.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1606A>G p.Lys536Glu missense_variant 12/271 NM_000492.4 P2P13569-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000797
AC:
20
AN:
250922
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000664
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
135616
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000580
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000185
AC:
27
AN:
1458232
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.0000152
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
725710
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000605
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74338
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.0000741
AC:
9

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicJan 16, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 05, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityApr 22, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 03, 2023The CFTR c.1606A>G (p.Lys536Glu) variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual with cystic fibrosis (PMID: 28992757 (2018)) and in a newborn screening study (PMID: 33572515 (2021)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00059 (21/35302 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Cystic fibrosis Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeAug 03, 2022This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 536 of the CFTR protein (p.Lys536Glu). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with cystic fibrosis (PMID: 28992757). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 595238). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 10, 2023The p.K536E variant (also known as c.1606A>G), located in coding exon 12 of the CFTR gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1606. The lysine at codon 536 is replaced by glutamic acid, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 05, 2023Variant summary: CFTR c.1606A>G (p.Lys536Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the ABC transporter-like, ATP-binding domain of the encoded protein sequence. Two of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-05 in 250922 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in CFTR causing Cystic Fibrosis (8e-05 vs 0.013), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1606A>G has been reported in the literature a patient with a positive sweat test without a second mutation detected (example, Ibarra-Gonzalez_2017), and during a newborn screening program, without strong evidence for causality provided (example, Bozdogan_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cystic Fibrosis. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33572515, 28992757, 25735457). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
CFTR-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Aug 09, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.047
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.060
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.72
D;.;D;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.24
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.30
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.35
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.40
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.16
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.59
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;.;N;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.69
Sift
Benign
0.11
T;.;T;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0060
D;.;D;.
Polyphen
0.76
P;.;.;.
Vest4
0.71
MutPred
0.59
Loss of ubiquitination at K536 (P = 0.0233);.;.;.;
MVP
0.98
MPC
0.0037
ClinPred
0.19
T
GERP RS
3.9
Varity_R
0.71
gMVP
0.91

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148173473; hg19: chr7-117227814; API