rs148346044
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_017547.4(FOXRED1):āc.124A>Cā(p.Lys42Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00421 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017547.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOXRED1 | NM_017547.4 | c.124A>C | p.Lys42Gln | missense_variant | 2/11 | ENST00000263578.10 | NP_060017.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOXRED1 | ENST00000263578.10 | c.124A>C | p.Lys42Gln | missense_variant | 2/11 | 1 | NM_017547.4 | ENSP00000263578.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00286 AC: 436AN: 152222Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00259 AC: 651AN: 251486Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00254 AC XY: 345AN XY: 135920
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00435 AC: 6353AN: 1461796Hom.: 21 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00419 AC XY: 3048AN XY: 727198
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00286 AC: 436AN: 152340Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00258 AC XY: 192AN XY: 74504
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | FOXRED1: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 05, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 19, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 21, 2016 | - - |
Mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at