rs148376885

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.25091C>T(p.Pro8364Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00227 in 1,614,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P8364R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

SYNE1
NM_182961.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.18

Variant links:

Genes affected

SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SYNE1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.026375264).

BP6

Variant 6-152143651-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152143651-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 281135.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-152143651-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 243 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SYNE1	NM_182961.4 link	c.25091C>T	p.Pro8364Leu	missense_variant	Exon 138 of 146	ENST00000367255.10	NP_892006.3
SYNE1	NM_001347702.2 link	c.1625C>T	p.Pro542Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 18	ENST00000354674.5	NP_001334631.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SYNE1	ENST00000367255.10 link	c.25091C>T	p.Pro8364Leu	missense_variant	Exon 138 of 146	1	NM_182961.4	ENSP00000356224.5		Q8NF91-1
SYNE1	ENST00000354674.5 link	c.1625C>T	p.Pro542Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 18	5	NM_001347702.2	ENSP00000346701.4		F8WAI0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00160

AC:

243

AN:

152112

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00197

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00264

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00241

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00175

AC:

441

AN:

251492

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00172

AC XY:

234

AN XY:

135922

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00323

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00258

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00358

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00234

AC:

3419

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00228

AC XY:

1658

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000239

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00132

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00402

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00269

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00207

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00160

AC:

243

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00150

AC XY:

112

AN XY:

74432

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00264

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00241

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00190

Alfa

AF:

0.00212

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00143

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00216

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00337

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00185

AC:

224

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00256

EpiControl

AF:

0.00172

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

SYNE1: BP4, BS2 -

Mar 19, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 13, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Jun 01, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 12, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant

Benign:1

Jan 24, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Intellectual disability

Benign:1

Jan 01, 2019

Centre de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

SYNE1-related disorder

Benign:1

Dec 16, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.13

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.26

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.15

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.68

D;.;.;T;T;T;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.83

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.84

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

D;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.073

MetaRNN

Benign

0.026

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.29

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.1

M;.;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.49

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-6.5

D;.;D;D;D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.33

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

D;.;D;D;D;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0040

D;D;D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

0.99

D;.;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.45

MVP

0.78

MPC

0.52

ClinPred

0.070

GERP RS

6.0

Varity_R

0.39

gMVP

0.41

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over