rs148425392
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_018136.5(ASPM):c.6727G>T(p.Val2243Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000855 in 1,612,556 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018136.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | NM_018136.5 | c.6727G>T | p.Val2243Leu | missense_variant | 18/28 | ENST00000367409.9 | NP_060606.3 | |
ASPM | NM_001206846.2 | c.4066-6360G>T | intron_variant | NP_001193775.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | ENST00000367409.9 | c.6727G>T | p.Val2243Leu | missense_variant | 18/28 | 1 | NM_018136.5 | ENSP00000356379 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00447 AC: 679AN: 151806Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00117 AC: 292AN: 249906Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000881 AC XY: 119AN XY: 135136
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000477 AC: 696AN: 1460632Hom.: 2 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.000410 AC XY: 298AN XY: 726656
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00449 AC: 682AN: 151924Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00436 AC XY: 324AN XY: 74230
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Oct 25, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Feb 11, 2016 | - - |
Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 05, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 12, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 16, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at