Menu
GeneBe

rs148447919

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):ā€‹c.1179A>Gā€‹(p.Gln393=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000949 in 1,612,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00093 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.692
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 1-216324317-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216324317-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48383.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr1-216324317-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.692 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
USH2ANM_206933.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1179A>G p.Gln393= synonymous_variant 7/72 ENST00000307340.8
USH2ANM_007123.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1179A>G p.Gln393= synonymous_variant 7/21

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
USH2AENST00000307340.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1179A>G p.Gln393= synonymous_variant 7/721 NM_206933.4 P1O75445-1
USH2AENST00000366942.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1179A>G p.Gln393= synonymous_variant 7/211 O75445-2
USH2AENST00000674083.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1179A>G p.Gln393= synonymous_variant 7/73 O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00112
AC:
170
AN:
152122
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00341
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00101
AC:
250
AN:
248536
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000935
AC XY:
126
AN XY:
134730
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000320
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00748
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000328
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00149
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000932
AC:
1361
AN:
1460520
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000891
AC XY:
647
AN XY:
726518
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00690
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000375
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000961
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000879
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00112
AC:
170
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00124
AC XY:
92
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00340
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.00162
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00121

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024USH2A: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 02, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22004887) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Usher syndrome type 2A Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Oct 05, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 25, 2016p.Gln393Gln in exon 7 of USH2A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.2% (102/58878) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broa dinstitute.org; dbSNP rs148447919). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 14, 2018- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.19
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148447919; hg19: chr1-216497659; API