Menu
GeneBe

rs148453034

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_005477.3(HCN4):c.1356C>T(p.Ser452=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00171 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

HCN4
NM_005477.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.05
Variant links:
Genes affected
HCN4 (HGNC:16882): (hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated potassium channel 4) This gene encodes a member of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channels. The encoded protein shows slow kinetics of activation and inactivation, and is necessary for the cardiac pacemaking process. This channel may also mediate responses to sour stimuli. Mutations in this gene have been linked to sick sinus syndrome 2, also known as atrial fibrillation with bradyarrhythmia or familial sinus bradycardia. Two pseudogenes have been identified on chromosome 15. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.32).
BP6
Variant 15-73332146-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-73332146-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 286612.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4, Likely_benign=1}. Variant chr15-73332146-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr15-73332146-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 168 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
HCN4NM_005477.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1356C>T p.Ser452= synonymous_variant 3/8 ENST00000261917.4
HCN4XM_011521148.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.138C>T p.Ser46= synonymous_variant 2/7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
HCN4ENST00000261917.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1356C>T p.Ser452= synonymous_variant 3/81 NM_005477.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00110
AC:
168
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000998
AC:
251
AN:
251446
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00101
AC XY:
137
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00177
AC:
2585
AN:
1461708
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00175
AC XY:
1275
AN XY:
727140
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000425
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00120
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00123
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00110
AC:
168
AN:
152338
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000926
AC XY:
69
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00140
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00102
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00131
EpiControl
AF:
0.00107

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 16, 2018- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 16, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 02, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Sick sinus syndrome 2, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Brugada syndrome 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 24, 2024- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 20, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.32
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Benign
0.81

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148453034; hg19: chr15-73624487; API