rs148462329
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_014714.4(IFT140):c.481C>T(p.Pro161Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000142 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P161R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014714.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- IFT140-related recessive ciliopathyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Illumina
- short-rib thoracic dysplasia 9 with or without polydactylyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosa 80Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leber congenital amaurosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Jeune syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_014714.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFT140 | NM_014714.4 | MANE Select | c.481C>T | p.Pro161Ser | missense | Exon 5 of 31 | NP_055529.2 | ||
| LOC105371046 | NR_135176.1 | n.59+11892G>A | intron | N/A |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFT140 | ENST00000426508.7 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.481C>T | p.Pro161Ser | missense | Exon 5 of 31 | ENSP00000406012.2 | ||
| IFT140 | ENST00000439987.6 | TSL:2 | n.542C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 19 | ||||
| IFT140 | ENST00000397417.6 | TSL:5 | n.329-8057C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000380562.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251172 AF XY: 0.00000737 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000144 AC: 21AN: 1461844Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000138 AC XY: 10AN XY: 727224 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74354 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Saldino-Mainzer syndrome Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with IFT140-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs148462329, gnomAD 0.003%). This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 161 of the IFT140 protein (p.Pro161Ser).
Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at