rs148468628

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_005199.5(CHRNG):c.125G>A(p.Arg42Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00287 in 1,614,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0029 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

CHRNG
NM_005199.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.76

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHRNG (HGNC:1967): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic gamma subunit) The mammalian muscle-type acetylcholine receptor is a transmembrane pentameric glycoprotein with two alpha subunits, one beta, one delta, and one epsilon (in adult skeletal muscle) or gamma (in fetal and denervated muscle) subunit. This gene, which encodes the gamma subunit, is expressed prior to the thirty-third week of gestation in humans. The gamma subunit of the acetylcholine receptor plays a role in neuromuscular organogenesis and ligand binding and disruption of gamma subunit expression prevents the correct localization of the receptor in cell membranes. Mutations in this gene cause Escobar syndrome and a lethal form of multiple pterygium syndrome. Muscle-type acetylcholine receptor is the major antigen in the autoimmune disease myasthenia gravis.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

CHRNG links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10330105).

BP6

Variant 2-232540061-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-232540061-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 376837.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-232540061-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00252 (384/152344) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00422 (287/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00382. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 187 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHRNG	NM_005199.5 link	c.125G>A	p.Arg42Gln	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 12	ENST00000651502.1	NP_005190.4	P07510-1A0A6F7YAP6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHRNG	ENST00000651502.1 link	c.125G>A	p.Arg42Gln	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 12		NM_005199.5	ENSP00000498757.1	P07510-1
CHRNG	ENST00000389492.3 link	c.125G>A	p.Arg42Gln	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 11	1		ENSP00000374143.3	P07510-2
CHRNG	ENST00000485094.1 link	n.146G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 5	1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00254

AC:

386

AN:

152226

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00691

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000847

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00423

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00229

AC:

576

AN:

251312

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00209

AC XY:

284

AN XY:

135838

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000369

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00506

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000647

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00374

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00212

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00291

AC:

4251

AN:

1461876

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00278

AC XY:

2023

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000448

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00528

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000468

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00340

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00320

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00252

AC:

384

AN:

152344

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00251

AC XY:

187

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000457

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00261

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00691

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000847

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00422

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00190

Alfa

AF:

0.00332

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00240

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00405

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00311

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00326

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00247

AC:

300

EpiCase

AF:

0.00354

EpiControl

AF:

0.00391

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:6

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 27, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30467950) -

May 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CHRNG: BS2 -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 04, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 18, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CHRNG c.125G>A (p.Arg42Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Neurotransmitter-gated ion-channel ligand-binding domain (IPR006202) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0023 in 282714 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0038 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3.4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CHRNG causing Lethal Multiple Pterygium Syndrome - CHRNG Related phenotype (0.0011), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. Six ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: two have classified the variant as of uncertain significance and four as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CHRNG p.Arg42Gln variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs148468628) and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital, and as uncertain significance by CeGat Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen). The variant was identified in control databases in 661 of 282714 chromosomes (3 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002338 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 52 of 10364 chromosomes (freq: 0.005017), European (non-Finnish) in 493 of 129072 chromosomes (freq: 0.00382), Other in 18 of 7222 chromosomes (freq: 0.002492), Latino in 67 of 35412 chromosomes (freq: 0.001892), European (Finnish) in 18 of 25114 chromosomes (freq: 0.000717), African in 11 of 24962 chromosomes (freq: 0.000441), East Asian in 1 of 19952 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), and South Asian in 1 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.000033). The p.Arg42 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Autosomal recessive multiple pterygium syndrome

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

CHRNG-related disorder

Benign:1

May 07, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.54

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.028

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.19

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.83

D;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.50

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.32

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.89

LIST_S2

Benign

0.84

T;T

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.24

MetaRNN

Benign

0.10

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.75

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

4.1

H;H

PrimateAI

Benign

0.42

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.4

D;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.73

Sift

Uncertain

0.0030

D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0050

D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.

Vest4

0.87

MVP

0.82

MPC

0.45

ClinPred

0.080

GERP RS

4.0

Varity_R

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over