rs148594393

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):​c.2510G>A​(p.Arg837Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000441 in 1,614,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R837W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.96
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0058992505).
BP6
Variant 1-216246884-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216246884-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 166517.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=2}. Variant chr1-216246884-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
USH2ANM_206933.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2510G>A p.Arg837Gln missense_variant 13/72 ENST00000307340.8 NP_996816.3 O75445-1
USH2ANM_007123.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2510G>A p.Arg837Gln missense_variant 13/21 NP_009054.6 O75445-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
USH2AENST00000307340.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2510G>A p.Arg837Gln missense_variant 13/721 NM_206933.4 ENSP00000305941.3 O75445-1
USH2AENST00000366942.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2510G>A p.Arg837Gln missense_variant 13/211 ENSP00000355909.3 O75445-2
USH2AENST00000674083.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2510G>A p.Arg837Gln missense_variant 13/73 ENSP00000501296.1 O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00246
AC:
375
AN:
152138
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00869
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000721
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000607
AC:
152
AN:
250400
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000473
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
135286
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00843
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000229
AC:
335
AN:
1461792
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000210
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00771
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000225
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000530
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00247
AC:
376
AN:
152258
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00244
AC XY:
182
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00869
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000440
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00259
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00681
AC:
30
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000651
AC:
79
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 14, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Arg837Gln in Exon 13 of USH2A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.6% (24/3738) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs148594393). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 27, 2017- -
Usher syndrome type 2A Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.057
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.64
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
0.013
DANN
Benign
0.53
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.018
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-2.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.011
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.49
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.018
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0059
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.1
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.98
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.071
Sift
Benign
0.40
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.91
T;T
Polyphen
0.0030
B;B
Vest4
0.17
MVP
0.67
MPC
0.033
ClinPred
0.0046
T
GERP RS
-12
Varity_R
0.017
gMVP
0.28

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148594393; hg19: chr1-216420226; API