rs148647933

Positions:

chr8-71271834-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000503.6(EYA1):c.890G>A(p.Arg297Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000075 in 1,614,098 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000072 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

EYA1
NM_000503.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.52

Variant links:

Genes affected

EYA1 (HGNC:3519): (EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 1) This gene encodes a member of the eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins. The encoded protein may play a role in the developing kidney, branchial arches, eye, and ear. Mutations of this gene have been associated with branchiootorenal dysplasia syndrome, branchiootic syndrome, and sporadic cases of congenital cataracts and ocular anterior segment anomalies. A similar protein in mice can act as a transcriptional activator. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]

EYA1 links:

EYA1 (HGNC:):

EYA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06588325).

BP6

Variant 8-71271834-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-71271834-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 363653.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000105 (16/152220) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00194 (10/5166). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 7 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 16 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EYA1	NM_000503.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.890G>A	p.Arg297Gln	missense_variant	10/18	ENST00000340726.8	NP_000494.2	Q99502-1A0A024R813B3KXR1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EYA1	ENST00000340726.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.890G>A	p.Arg297Gln	missense_variant	10/18	1	NM_000503.6	ENSP00000342626.3		Q99502-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000986

AC:

AN:

152102

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000155

AC:

AN:

251466

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000809

AC XY:

AN XY:

135904

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000718

AC:

105

AN:

1461878

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000578

AC XY:

AN XY:

727238

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000896

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000756

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000126

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000927

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000941

AC XY:

AN XY:

74418

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00194

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Alfa

AF:

0.000154

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000128

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000157

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00346

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

May 21, 2016

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Arg297Gln var iant in EYA1 has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss, but has been identified in 0.2% (17/8654) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs148647933 ). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide stron g support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinica l significance of the p.Arg297Gln variant is uncertain, its frequency in the ExA C database suggests that it is more likely to be benign. -

Branchiootic syndrome 1

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

EYA1-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jul 26, 2021

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Melnick-Fraser syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 06, 2024

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

May 03, 2023

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Otofaciocervical syndrome 1

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.37

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.071

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.10

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.51

D;D;D;.;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.77

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.78

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.99

.;.;.;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.078

MetaRNN

Benign

0.066

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.31

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.8

M;M;M;.;.;.;M;M;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.80

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.9

N;.;N;N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.52

Sift

Uncertain

0.011

D;.;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;.;.;D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.075

T;.;T;T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;T;T

Polyphen

0.99

D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.74

MVP

0.84

MPC

0.65

ClinPred

0.22

GERP RS

5.7

Varity_R

0.21

gMVP

0.57

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over