rs148656104

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_020529.3(NFKBIA):c.581G>C(p.Gly194Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000471 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G194D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NFKBIA
NM_020529.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.79

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NFKBIA (HGNC:7797): (NFKB inhibitor alpha) This gene encodes a member of the NF-kappa-B inhibitor family, which contain multiple ankrin repeat domains. The encoded protein interacts with REL dimers to inhibit NF-kappa-B/REL complexes which are involved in inflammatory responses. The encoded protein moves between the cytoplasm and the nucleus via a nuclear localization signal and CRM1-mediated nuclear export. Mutations in this gene have been found in ectodermal dysplasia anhidrotic with T-cell immunodeficiency autosomal dominant disease. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

NFKBIA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ectodermal dysplasia and immunodeficiency 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
ectodermal dysplasia and immune deficiency
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

NFKBIA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011518031).

BP6

Variant 14-35402826-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-35402826-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 313110.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 401 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NFKBIA	NM_020529.3 link	c.581G>C	p.Gly194Ala	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 6	ENST00000216797.10	NP_065390.1	P25963

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NFKBIA	ENST00000216797.10 link	c.581G>C	p.Gly194Ala	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 6	1	NM_020529.3	ENSP00000216797.6		P25963

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00264

AC:

401

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00884

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00190

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000669

AC:

168

AN:

251126

AF XY:

0.000486

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00930

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000376

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000246

AC:

360

AN:

1461868

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000193

AC XY:

140

AN XY:

727236

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00863

AC:

289

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000715

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000520

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1112002

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000580

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

100

125

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00263

AC:

401

AN:

152266

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00265

AC XY:

197

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00881

AC:

366

AN:

41528

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00190

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.506

Heterozygous variant carriers

111

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000490

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00325

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0109

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000889

AC:

108

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Jan 24, 2017

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 23, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Ectodermal dysplasia and immunodeficiency 2

Benign:2

Jan 08, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jun 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

NFKBIA: BS1, BS2 -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

NFKBIA-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 08, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.70

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.23

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.10

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.32

T;T;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.84

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.82

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;D;D

MetaRNN

Benign

0.012

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.14

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.6

M;.;.

PhyloP100

5.8

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.80

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.3

D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.55

Sift

Uncertain

0.018

D;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.027

D;T;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;.

Vest4

0.78

MVP

0.72

MPC

1.3

ClinPred

0.028

GERP RS

5.6

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.40

gMVP

0.49

Mutation Taster

=61/39

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over