Menu
GeneBe

rs148674729

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_178452.6(DNAAF1):ā€‹c.1227T>Gā€‹(p.Gly409=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000594 in 1,613,696 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0032 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00033 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF1
NM_178452.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.621
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAAF1 (HGNC:30539): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is cilium-specific and is required for the stability of the ciliary architecture. It is involved in the regulation of microtubule-based cilia and actin-based brush border microvilli. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia-13. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 16-84170055-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-84170055-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 262938.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.621 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00315 (480/152230) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0105 (438/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00973. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 213 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAAF1NM_178452.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1227T>G p.Gly409= synonymous_variant 8/12 ENST00000378553.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAAF1ENST00000378553.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1227T>G p.Gly409= synonymous_variant 8/121 NM_178452.6 P1Q8NEP3-1
DNAAF1ENST00000563818.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.904T>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 4/82
DNAAF1ENST00000570298.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.1381T>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 8/112
DNAAF1ENST00000563093.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1225+2T>G splice_donor_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 2 Q8NEP3-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00314
AC:
477
AN:
152112
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000752
AC:
189
AN:
251300
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000611
AC XY:
83
AN XY:
135828
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000328
AC:
479
AN:
1461466
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
95
AF XY:
0.000311
AC XY:
226
AN XY:
727056
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0125
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000470
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000597
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00315
AC:
480
AN:
152230
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00286
AC XY:
213
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00135
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00360
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 17, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 21, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 13 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
CADD
Benign
1.9
DANN
Benign
0.45

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148674729; hg19: chr16-84203661; API