rs148690585

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.216C>T(p.Tyr72Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000644 in 1,614,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000044 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51D
NM_002878.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0400

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD51D (HGNC:9823): (RAD51 paralog D) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RAD51 protein family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51, which are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein forms a complex with several other members of the RAD51 family, including RAD51L1, RAD51L2, and XRCC2. The protein complex formed with this protein has been shown to catalyze homologous pairing between single- and double-stranded DNA, and is thought to play a role in the early stage of recombinational repair of DNA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream ring finger and FYVE-like domain containing 1 (RFFL) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

RAD51D links:

ENSG00000267618 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000267618 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).

BP6

Variant 17-35118548-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-35118548-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138874.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-35118548-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.04 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 40 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD51D	NM_002878.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.216C>T	p.Tyr72Tyr	synonymous_variant	3/10	ENST00000345365.11	NP_002869.3	O75771-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD51D	ENST00000345365.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.216C>T	p.Tyr72Tyr	synonymous_variant	3/10	1	NM_002878.4	ENSP00000338790.6		O75771-1
ENSG00000267618	ENST00000593039.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.3+2743C>T		intron_variant		2		ENSP00000466834.1		K7EN88

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000845

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000578

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000107

AC:

AN:

251474

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000809

AC XY:

AN XY:

135920

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000923

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000598

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000438

AC:

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000316

AC XY:

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000568

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000225

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000149

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

152278

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000242

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000842

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000580

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000193

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000329

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 24, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Apr 23, 2020	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	May 02, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Sep 28, 2016	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Nov 02, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Jan 31, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Aug 18, 2014	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Jul 26, 2016	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 24, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Apr 06, 2023	This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Mar 01, 2023

RAD51D: BP4, BP7 -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

The RAD51D p.Tyr72= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs148690585) â€šÃ„ÃºWith other alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹, ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, Invitae; likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, Genetic Services Laboratory (University of Chicago), Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano and Color Genomics), Clinvitae, and in control databases in 42 of 277194 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 28 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European Non-Finnish in 3 of 126696 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), and East Asian in 11 of 18868 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), while not observed in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Tyr72= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Benign

7.6

DANN

Benign

0.85

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over