rs148697028

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001130987.2(DYSF):c.1311C>T(p.Ile437Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000339 in 1,614,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00032 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

DYSF
NM_001130987.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.83

Variant links:

Genes affected

DYSF (HGNC:3097): (dysferlin) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the ferlin family and is a skeletal muscle protein found associated with the sarcolemma. It is involved in muscle contraction and contains C2 domains that play a role in calcium-mediated membrane fusion events, suggesting that it may be involved in membrane regeneration and repair. In addition, the protein encoded by this gene binds caveolin-3, a skeletal muscle membrane protein which is important in the formation of caveolae. Specific mutations in this gene have been shown to cause autosomal recessive limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B (LGMD2B) as well as Miyoshi myopathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

DYSF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).

BP6

Variant 2-71528332-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-71528332-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 284511.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr2-71528332-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.83 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000341 (499/1461828) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00763 (44/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00584. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 256 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYSF	NM_001130987.2 link	c.1311C>T	p.Ile437Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 56	ENST00000410020.8	NP_001124459.1	O75923-13
DYSF	NM_003494.4 link	c.1215C>T	p.Ile405Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 55	ENST00000258104.8	NP_003485.1	O75923-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DYSF	ENST00000410020.8 link	c.1311C>T	p.Ile437Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 56	1	NM_001130987.2	ENSP00000386881.3		O75923-13
DYSF	ENST00000258104.8 link	c.1215C>T	p.Ile405Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 55	1	NM_003494.4	ENSP00000258104.3		O75923-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000322

AC:

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00807

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0190

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000732

AC:

184

AN:

251314

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000670

AC XY:

AN XY:

135830

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00168

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00775

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000211

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00375

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000341

AC:

499

AN:

1461828

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000352

AC XY:

256

AN XY:

727200

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00177

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00830

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000953

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000778

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000322

AC:

AN:

152336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000282

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00807

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000691

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000434

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Qualitative or quantitative defects of dysferlin

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 06, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, recessive

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Miyoshi myopathy

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 11, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Sep 18, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B

Benign:1

Oct 23, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.81

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over