rs148697064

Positions:

chr2-201272669-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_001372051.1(CASP8):c.443A>G(p.Lys148Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000605 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00065 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CASP8
NM_001372051.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.51

Variant links:

Genes affected

CASP8 (HGNC:1509): (caspase 8) This gene encodes a member of the cysteine-aspartic acid protease (caspase) family. Sequential activation of caspases plays a central role in the execution-phase of cell apoptosis. Caspases exist as inactive proenzymes composed of a prodomain, a large protease subunit, and a small protease subunit. Activation of caspases requires proteolytic processing at conserved internal aspartic residues to generate a heterodimeric enzyme consisting of the large and small subunits. This protein is involved in the programmed cell death induced by Fas and various apoptotic stimuli. The N-terminal FADD-like death effector domain of this protein suggests that it may interact with Fas-interacting protein FADD. This protein was detected in the insoluble fraction of the affected brain region from Huntington disease patients but not in those from normal controls, which implicated the role in neurodegenerative diseases. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described, although not all variants have had their full-length sequences determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CASP8 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22219804).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000647 (946/1461840) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000784 (872/1111970). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000741. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 462 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CASP8	NM_001372051.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.443A>G	p.Lys148Arg	missense_variant	4/9	ENST00000673742.1	NP_001358980.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CASP8	ENST00000673742.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.443A>G	p.Lys148Arg	missense_variant	4/9		NM_001372051.1	ENSP00000501268	P1	Q14790-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000323

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000338

AC:

AN:

251442

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000294

AC XY:

AN XY:

135900

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000616

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000977

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000647

AC:

946

AN:

1461840

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000635

AC XY:

462

AN XY:

727230

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000268

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000784

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00101

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

AN XY:

74362

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000323

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000464

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000196

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000698

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000329

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000818

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type 2B

Uncertain:4

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Baylor Genetics	Feb 09, 2018	This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	New York Genome Center	Jun 19, 2020	The inherited p.Lys148Arg missense variant substitutes Lysine residue with an Arginine residue at position 148 of the CASP8 protein. The affected residue is evolutionarily conserved. The p.Lys148Arg variant is predicteddeleterious bymultiple in silico prediction tools. The variant has been reported in ClinVar database as a variant of uncertain significance (variation ID: 333500). The p.Lys148Arg variant has 0.0001814 allele frequency in the gnomAD(v3)database (26 out of 143,314 heterozygous alleles, no homozygotes) indicating it is a rare allele in the general population. Based on the available evidence, the inherited p.Lys148Arg missense variant identified in CASP8 gene is assessed as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 180 of the CASP8 protein (p.Lys180Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs148697064, gnomAD 0.06%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CASP8-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 333500). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt CASP8 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.16

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.11

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.55

.;D;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;.;T;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.54

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.54

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Benign

0.83

T;T;D;D;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.059

MetaRNN

Benign

0.22

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.41

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.4

M;M;.;.;M;.;.;.;.;M;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

0.95

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;N

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.53

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.1

N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;D;N

REVEL

Benign

0.28

Sift

Benign

0.38

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.083

T;T;T;D;T;T;T;T;T;T;D;T

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;P;.;P;.;D;.;P;P;.;.

Vest4

0.32

MVP

0.97

MPC

0.76

ClinPred

0.077

GERP RS

6.0

Varity_R

0.68

gMVP

0.22

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over