Menu
GeneBe

rs148718874

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.4812G>T(p.Arg1604Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000638 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1604G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00087 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00061 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

PCDH15
NM_033056.4 missense

Scores

1
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.264
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCDH15 (HGNC:14674): (protocadherin related 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. Mutations in this gene result in hearing loss and Usher Syndrome Type IF (USH1F). Extensive alternative splicing resulting in multiple isoforms has been observed in the mouse ortholog. Similar alternatively spliced transcripts are inferred to occur in human, and additional variants are likely to occur. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0037893355).
BP6
Variant 10-53822914-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-53822914-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 227009.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-53822914-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-53822914-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000867 (132/152264) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0234 (121/5172). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.02. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 65 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 12 AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PCDH15NM_033056.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4812G>T p.Arg1604Ser missense_variant 33/33 ENST00000320301.11
PCDH15NM_001384140.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.4368-2684G>T intron_variant ENST00000644397.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PCDH15ENST00000320301.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.4812G>T p.Arg1604Ser missense_variant 33/331 NM_033056.4 Q96QU1-1
PCDH15ENST00000644397.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.4368-2684G>T intron_variant NM_001384140.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000881
AC:
134
AN:
152146
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0237
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00210
AC:
529
AN:
251356
Hom.:
12
AF XY:
0.00186
AC XY:
252
AN XY:
135848
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0280
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000614
AC:
897
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000568
AC XY:
413
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00106
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000867
AC:
132
AN:
152264
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000873
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.00117
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00129
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00199
AC:
242
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00577
AC:
20
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 23, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26166082, 29625443, 31180159, 33090715) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenDec 01, 2022PCDH15: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 28, 2023Variant summary: PCDH15 c.4812G>T (p.Arg1604Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0021 in 251356 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.028 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 9 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PCDH15 causing Usher Syndrome Type 1F phenotype (0.0032), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.4812G>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with poor cochlear implants outcome and vestibular dysfunction (examples: Wu_2015 and Guan_2021) and one of these reports classified the variant as VUS (Guan_2021). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Usher Syndrome Type 1F. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 26166082, 34416374). Seven submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as VUS (n=1) and benign/ likely benign (n=6). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineOct 20, 2015p.Arg1604Ser in exon 33 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 2.75% (238/8654) of East Asian c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; rs148718874). -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingWangQJ Lab, Chinese People's Liberation Army General HospitalJul 01, 2021- -
Usher syndrome type 1D;C1836027:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23;C1865885:Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 29, 2022- -
Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 06, 2020- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.47
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
Cadd
Benign
8.8
Dann
Benign
0.90
Eigen
Benign
-0.98
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.081
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0038
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.67
N;.;.;N;N;N;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.088
T;.;.;T;T;T;.;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.56
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.13
B;.;.;B;B;B;.;B;B
Vest4
0.38
MutPred
0.45
.;.;.;Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0731);.;.;.;.;.;
MVP
0.47
MPC
0.032
ClinPred
0.0051
T
GERP RS
-1.9
Varity_R
0.082
gMVP
0.24

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148718874; hg19: chr10-55582674; COSMIC: COSV100214895; COSMIC: COSV100214895; API