rs148720124

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.7998G>T(p.Glu2666Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00225 in 1,613,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.706

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAH5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.050961107).

BP6

Variant 5-13793948-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13793948-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 188229.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=4}. Variant chr5-13793948-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00234 (3424/1461676) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00282 (3140/1111850). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00274. There are 16 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1708 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 16 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	NM_001369.3 link	c.7998G>T	p.Glu2666Asp	missense_variant	Exon 48 of 79	ENST00000265104.5	NP_001360.1	Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAH5	ENST00000265104.5 link	c.7998G>T	p.Glu2666Asp	missense_variant	Exon 48 of 79	1	NM_001369.3	ENSP00000265104.4		Q8TE73
DNAH5	ENST00000681290.1 link	c.7953G>T	p.Glu2651Asp	missense_variant	Exon 48 of 79			ENSP00000505288.1		A0A7P0Z455

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00137

AC:

209

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000459

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000188

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00238

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00122

AC:

307

AN:

250870

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00121

AC XY:

164

AN XY:

135564

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000369

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000719

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000277

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00199

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00234

AC:

3424

AN:

1461676

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00235

AC XY:

1708

AN XY:

727156

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000904

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000449

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00282

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00199

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00137

AC:

208

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00126

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000457

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000830

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000188

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00238

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.00186

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00124

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00351

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00136

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00256

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00123

AC:

149

EpiCase

AF:

0.00224

EpiControl

AF:

0.00279

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Mar 06, 2017

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 26, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:3

Mar 07, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 09, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

DNAH5: BS2 -

Aug 09, 2024

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Identified in a patient with idiopathic isolated asthenozoospermia in published literature and to our knowledge has not been published as pathogenic or benign in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PMID: 18492703); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30198353, 18492703) -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Jun 05, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Glu2666Asp va riant in DNAH5 has been reported in 1 heterozygous Caucasian individual with iso lated asthenozoospermia (Zuccarello 2008). It has also been identified in 0.2% ( 115/66240) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, ht tp://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs148720124). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide strong support for or against an impac t to the protein. In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Glu2666As p variant is uncertain, its frequency suggests that it is more likely to be beni gn. -

DNAH5-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 17, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.46

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.32

Eigen

Benign

-0.52

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.61

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.32

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.97

M_CAP

Benign

0.070

MetaRNN

Benign

0.051

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.88

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.0

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.63

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.9

REVEL

Benign

0.21

Sift

Benign

0.084

Polyphen

0.61

Vest4

0.74

MutPred

0.38

Loss of helix (P = 0.0558);

MVP

0.43

MPC

0.25

ClinPred

0.19

GERP RS

-1.8

Varity_R

0.35

gMVP

0.41

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over