rs148725540
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.3173A>G(p.Asp1058Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000988 in 1,614,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00056 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
APC
NM_000038.6 missense
NM_000038.6 missense
Scores
1
9
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.16
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03436765).
BP6
Variant 5-112838767-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112838767-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41523.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=9, not_provided=1, Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr5-112838767-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr5-112838767-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 85 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.3173A>G | p.Asp1058Gly | missense_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000257430.9 | NP_000029.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.3173A>G | p.Asp1058Gly | missense_variant | 16/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000552 AC: 84AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
84
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000599 AC: 150AN: 250576Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000591 AC XY: 80AN XY: 135440
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
150
AN:
250576
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
135440
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00103 AC: 1510AN: 1461820Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000997 AC XY: 725AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1510
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
725
AN XY:
727210
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000558 AC: 85AN: 152358Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000604 AC XY: 45AN XY: 74504
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
85
AN:
152358
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
74504
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
9
ExAC
AF:
AC:
58
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:22Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:9
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The APC p.Asp1058Gly variant was identified in 3 of 3262 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with gastric cancer or FAP (Ghatak 2017, Kerr 2013). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs148725540) as “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified as benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae; as likely benign by Color Genomics; as uncertain significance by Counsyl and one clinical laboratory), Clinvitae, Cosmic (2x in diffuse adenocarcinoma), MutDB, LOVD 3.0 (6x conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity), and in UMD-LSDB (6x likely neutral). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic APC variant (c.2016_2017delTA,p.His672GlnfsX7), increasing the likelihood that the p.Asp1058Gly variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 165 of 276366 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 9 of 24010 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), Other in 1 of 6458 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 8 of 34390 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 93 of 126014 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Finnish in 29 of 25782 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), and South Asian in 25 of 30766 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, or East Asian, populations. The p.Asp1058 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 28, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2023 | APC: BP2, BS1 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 08, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:2Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Feb 22, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed in conjunction with multiple pathogenic variants, reducing the likelihood this variant itself is pathogenic. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 16, 2018 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Nov 24, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Aug 05, 2021 | The APC c.3173A>G (p.Asp1058Gly) missense change has a maximum non-founder subpopulation frequency of 0.072% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/5-112174464-A-G). This is higher than the reported incidence of APC-related familial adenomatous polyposis (BS1). In silico tools are not in agreement about the effect of this variant on protein function, but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. This variant has been reported in non-cancer control subjects and individuals without a phenotype suggestive of APC-related familial adenomatous polyposis (PMID: 30267214, internal data). This variant has been reported to co-occur with known pathogenic variants in APC (BP2; PMID: 23159591, UMD database). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: BS1, BP2. - |
not specified Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 30, 2021 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 19, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 08, 2021 | Variant summary: APC c.3173A>G (p.Asp1058Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) family (IPR026818) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0006 in 250576 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00074 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 10 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in APC causing Familial Adenomatous Polyposis phenotype (7.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.3173A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, colorectal cancer, as well as unaffected individuals, without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Kerr_2013, Out_2015, Ghatak_2017, Johnston_2012). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants has been reported (APC c.2016_2017delTA, p.His672GlnfsX7, UMD; unspecified variants, Kerr_2013), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Eleven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as likely benign (n=6), variant of uncertain significance (n=3) and benign (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 21, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | May 09, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 18, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 21, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jan 23, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;D;D;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;.;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;T
Polyphen
0.38
.;B;B;.
Vest4
0.53, 0.55
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at