rs148917889

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_003640.5(ELP1):c.948G>A(p.Pro316Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000773 in 1,613,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00042 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ELP1
NM_003640.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.171

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ELP1 (HGNC:5959): (elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a scaffold protein and a regulator for three different kinases involved in proinflammatory signaling. The encoded protein can bind NF-kappa-B-inducing kinase and I-kappa-B kinases through separate domains and assemble them into an active kinase complex. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dysautonomia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

ELP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

primary dysautonomia
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health
Riley-Day syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
medulloblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

ELP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).

BP6

Variant 9-108916214-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-108916214-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 455974.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.171 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ELP1	NM_003640.5 link	c.948G>A	p.Pro316Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 37	ENST00000374647.10	NP_003631.2	O95163Q4LE38Q8N516
ELP1	NM_001318360.2 link	c.606G>A	p.Pro202Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 37		NP_001305289.1	O95163A0A6Q8PGW3B4E3I9
ELP1	XM_047423991.1 link	c.948G>A	p.Pro316Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 25		XP_047279947.1
ELP1	NM_001330749.2 link	c.-100G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 8 of 35		NP_001317678.1	F5H2T0B3KNB2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ELP1	ENST00000374647.10 link	c.948G>A	p.Pro316Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 37	1	NM_003640.5	ENSP00000363779.5		O95163

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000421

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000706

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000505

AC:

127

AN:

251454

AF XY:

0.000545

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000298

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000809

AC:

1183

AN:

1461476

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000798

AC XY:

580

AN XY:

727066

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000120

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000358

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39688

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000394

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00364

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000958

AC:

1065

AN:

1111638

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000613

AC:

AN:

60384

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.461

Heterozygous variant carriers

122

183

244

305

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

126

168

210

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000420

AC:

AN:

152300

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000363

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000337

AC:

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000706

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.515

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000602

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000525

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00164

EpiControl

AF:

0.00101

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial dysautonomia

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Dec 17, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:3

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 30, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

ELP1: BP4, BP7 -

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 16, 2025

Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.75

CADD

Benign

8.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.53

PhyloP100

0.17

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over