rs148925210
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_182919.4(TICAM1):c.1720C>G(p.Leu574Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182919.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- herpes simplex encephalitis, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AR, AD, SD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_182919.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TICAM1 | MANE Select | c.1720C>G | p.Leu574Val | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_891549.1 | Q8IUC6 | ||
| TICAM1 | c.1678C>G | p.Leu560Val | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_001372607.1 | ||||
| TICAM1 | c.1585C>G | p.Leu529Val | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_001372608.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000139 AC: 35AN: 251312 AF XY: 0.000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000168 AC: 245AN: 1461820Hom.: 0 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.000146 AC XY: 106AN XY: 727202 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74366 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at