rs149031291

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.1450G>A(p.Val484Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000768 in 1,613,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V484L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000080 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
NM_006206.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.18

Publications

10 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

PDGFRA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

gastrointestinal stromal tumor
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinal
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
congenital heart disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
isolated cleft palate
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

PDGFRA links:

ENSG00000282278 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000282278 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20390713).

BP6

Variant 4-54273622-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54273622-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 240309.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 7 Unknown,AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006206.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
PDGFRA	NM_006206.6	MANE Select	c.1450G>A	p.Val484Met	missense	Exon 10 of 23	NP_006197.1	P16234-1
PDGFRA	NM_001347828.2		c.1525G>A	p.Val509Met	missense	Exon 11 of 24	NP_001334757.1
PDGFRA	NM_001347830.2		c.1489G>A	p.Val497Met	missense	Exon 10 of 23	NP_001334759.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
PDGFRA	ENST00000257290.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1450G>A	p.Val484Met	missense	Exon 10 of 23	ENSP00000257290.5	P16234-1
ENSG00000282278	ENST00000507166.5	TSL:2	c.1018-1303G>A		intron	N/A	ENSP00000423325.1	A0A0B4J203
PDGFRA	ENST00000509092.5	TSL:1	n.1268G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 9 of 15

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152096

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

251124

AF XY:

0.0000884

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000163

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000924

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000793

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000800

AC:

117

AN:

1461780

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000866

AC XY:

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000374

AC:

AN:

53410

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000899

AC:

100

AN:

1111918

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000182

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.471

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152096

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000404

AC XY:

AN XY:

74296

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41394

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000655

AC:

AN:

15276

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4806

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000882

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.468

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000113

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000604

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000349

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (2)

not provided (2)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome (1)

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (1)

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome;C5193005:Polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinal (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.11

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.23

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.31

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.20

Eigen

Benign

-0.16

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.14

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.90

LIST_S2

Benign

0.77

M_CAP

Benign

0.038

MetaRNN

Benign

0.20

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.62

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.66

PhyloP100

3.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.44

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.2

REVEL

Benign

0.21

Sift

Benign

0.054

Sift4G

Benign

0.12

Polyphen

0.53

Vest4

0.32

MVP

0.75

MPC

0.33

ClinPred

0.14

GERP RS

2.8

Varity_R

0.046

gMVP

0.67

Mutation Taster

=92/8

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over