rs149096794
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):āc.6082T>Cā(p.Ser2028Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000276 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0015 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00015 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense
NM_001378454.1 missense
Scores
1
2
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.29
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006646991).
BP6
Variant 2-73452609-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73452609-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 391989.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2, Uncertain_risk_allele=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00152 (231/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00515 (214/41554). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00458. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 118 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | NM_001378454.1 | c.6082T>C | p.Ser2028Pro | missense_variant | 8/23 | ENST00000613296.6 | NP_001365383.1 | |
ALMS1 | NM_015120.4 | c.6082T>C | p.Ser2028Pro | missense_variant | 8/23 | NP_055935.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | ENST00000613296.6 | c.6082T>C | p.Ser2028Pro | missense_variant | 8/23 | 1 | NM_001378454.1 | ENSP00000482968.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00150 AC: 229AN: 152176Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
229
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000393 AC: 98AN: 249198Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000251 AC XY: 34AN XY: 135210
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
98
AN:
249198
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
135210
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000146 AC: 214AN: 1461776Hom.: 2 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.000110 AC XY: 80AN XY: 727174
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
214
AN:
1461776
Hom.:
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
727174
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00152 AC: 231AN: 152294Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 118AN XY: 74460
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
231
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
118
AN XY:
74460
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
12
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
58
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Alstrom syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 15, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | ALMS1 NM_015120.4 exon 8 p.Ser2027Pro (c.6079T>C): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.5% (129/24192) of African alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database, including one homozygote (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-73679736-T-C). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:391989). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Uncertain risk allele, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic | - | Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs149096794 in Alstrom syndrome yet. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 23, 2019 | Variant summary: ALMS1 c.6079T>C, also referred to as c.6085T>C using the refseq HGVS naming convention (p.Ser2027Pro), results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Alstrom syndrome repeat domain (IPR040972) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 249198 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0055 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ALMS1 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.0022), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.6079T>C in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine | Feb 17, 2017 | ACMG criteria: PP3 (3 predictors), BS1 (1% in 1000G-AFR), BP4 (4 predictors), BP1 (truncating known to cause disease), (BS2)for 1 homozygote in ExAC=Likely Benign - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 05, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 07, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
PrimateAI
Benign
T
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D;D
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at