rs149127230
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.2104G>A (p.GLu702Lys) variant has an allele frequency of 0.001714 (0.2%, 71/41,414 alleles) in the African subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort (BA1). Therefore, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA288054/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.2104G>A | p.Glu702Lys | missense_variant | 13/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1921G>A | p.Glu641Lys | missense_variant | 12/15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.556G>A | p.Glu186Lys | missense_variant | 13/16 | NP_001304114.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.139G>A | p.Glu47Lys | missense_variant | 12/15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.2104G>A | p.Glu702Lys | missense_variant | 13/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769 | P1 | |
ENST00000563916.1 | upstream_gene_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000519 AC: 79AN: 152142Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000167 AC: 42AN: 251084Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135726
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000821 AC: 120AN: 1461672Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000811 AC XY: 59AN XY: 727120
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000519 AC: 79AN: 152142Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000444 AC XY: 33AN XY: 74308
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 07, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 25, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BA1 (PMID: 30311375) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Mar 11, 2015 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 17, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 14, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26927868, 27442865, 25980754, 28135145, 28873162, 28944238, 28125075) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 05, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 23, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 17, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 14, 2020 | Variant summary: CDH1 c.2104G>A (p.Glu702Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00021 in 282492 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0016 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 57 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. In addition, this variant was found in nine healthy older women in a reputed germline gnomic database (FLOSSIES). The variant, c.2104G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (Yurgelun_2015/2017, Ghazani_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (2x), likely benign (5x) and benign (2x). Additionally, one expert panel (ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel) cites this variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 03, 2021 | - - |
Endometrial carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Oct 08, 2019 | This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The available evidence on this variant's pathogenicity is insufficient or conflicting. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PM2. - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Aug 08, 2023 | The c.2104G>A (p.GLu702Lys) variant has an allele frequency of 0.001714 (0.2%, 71/41,414 alleles) in the African subpopulation of the gnomAD cohort (BA1). Therefore, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BA1. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at