rs149159881
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_005529.7(HSPG2):c.11072C>T(p.Thr3691Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000792 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
HSPG2
NM_005529.7 missense
NM_005529.7 missense
Scores
12
7
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.72
Genes affected
HSPG2 (HGNC:5273): (heparan sulfate proteoglycan 2) This gene encodes the perlecan protein, which consists of a core protein to which three long chains of glycosaminoglycans (heparan sulfate or chondroitin sulfate) are attached. The perlecan protein is a large multidomain proteoglycan that binds to and cross-links many extracellular matrix components and cell-surface molecules. It has been shown that this protein interacts with laminin, prolargin, collagen type IV, FGFBP1, FBLN2, FGF7 and transthyretin, etc., and it plays essential roles in multiple biological activities. Perlecan is a key component of the vascular extracellular matrix, where it helps to maintain the endothelial barrier function. It is a potent inhibitor of smooth muscle cell proliferation and is thus thought to help maintain vascular homeostasis. It can also promote growth factor (e.g., FGF2) activity and thus stimulate endothelial growth and re-generation. It is a major component of basement membranes, where it is involved in the stabilization of other molecules as well as being involved with glomerular permeability to macromolecules and cell adhesion. Mutations in this gene cause Schwartz-Jampel syndrome type 1, Silverman-Handmaker type of dyssegmental dysplasia, and tardive dyskinesia. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.026100904).
BP6
Variant 1-21833291-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-21833291-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 295725.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=5, Benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000663 (101/152316) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00435 (21/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00292. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 58 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPG2 | ENST00000374695.8 | c.11072C>T | p.Thr3691Ile | missense_variant | 80/97 | 1 | NM_005529.7 | ENSP00000363827.3 | ||
HSPG2 | ENST00000635682.1 | c.203C>T | p.Thr68Ile | missense_variant | 2/9 | 5 | ENSP00000489161.1 | |||
HSPG2 | ENST00000471322.2 | n.1427C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/5 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000677 AC: 103AN: 152198Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
103
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00109 AC: 275AN: 251370Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00135 AC XY: 184AN XY: 135880
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
275
AN:
251370
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
184
AN XY:
135880
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000806 AC: 1178AN: 1461818Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000986 AC XY: 717AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1178
AN:
1461818
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
717
AN XY:
727214
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000663 AC: 101AN: 152316Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000779 AC XY: 58AN XY: 74472
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
101
AN:
152316
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74472
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
AC:
138
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2023 | HSPG2: BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 07, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 11, 2024 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 30, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Oct 29, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 02, 2018 | - - |
Schwartz-Jampel syndrome;C1857100:Lethal Kniest-like syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Lethal Kniest-like syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
HSPG2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 25, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Schwartz-Jampel syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at