rs149163610

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000294.3(PHKG2):c.360A>G(p.Thr120=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000392 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PHKG2
NM_000294.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.723

Variant links:

Genes affected

PHKG2 (HGNC:8931): (phosphorylase kinase catalytic subunit gamma 2) Phosphorylase kinase is a polymer of 16 subunits, four each of alpha, beta, gamma and delta. The alpha subunit includes the skeletal muscle and hepatic isoforms, encoded by two different genes. The beta subunit is the same in both the muscle and hepatic isoforms, and encoded by one gene. The gamma subunit also includes the skeletal muscle and hepatic isoforms, and the hepatic isoform is encoded by this gene. The delta subunit is a calmodulin and can be encoded by three different genes. The gamma subunits contain the active site of the enzyme, whereas the alpha and beta subunits have regulatory functions controlled by phosphorylation. The delta subunit mediates the dependence of the enzyme on calcium concentration. Mutations in this gene cause glycogen storage disease type 9C, also known as autosomal liver glycogenosis. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified in this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Feb 2010]

PHKG2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).

BP6

Variant 16-30753265-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-30753265-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 388646.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000236 (36/152318) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000426 (29/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000304. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 13 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
PHKG2	NM_000294.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.360A>G	p.Thr120=	synonymous_variant	5/10	ENST00000563588.6
PHKG2	NM_001172432.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.360A>G	p.Thr120=	synonymous_variant	5/11

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
PHKG2	ENST00000563588.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.360A>G	p.Thr120=	synonymous_variant	5/10	1	NM_000294.3	P4	P15735-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000237

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000426

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000310

AC:

AN:

251362

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000353

AC XY:

AN XY:

135858

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000616

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000598

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000408

AC:

596

AN:

1461834

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000382

AC XY:

278

AN XY:

727214

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000119

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000812

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000496

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000381

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000236

AC:

AN:

152318

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000175

AC XY:

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000426

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000381

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000219

EpiCase

AF:

0.000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease IXc

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Dec 21, 2023	- -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Feb 07, 2018

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Sep 01, 2022

PHKG2: BP4, BP7 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.66

Cadd

Benign

7.6

Dann

Benign

0.70

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over