rs149171782
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_032634.4(PIGO):c.2268G>A(p.Ala756Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00461 in 1,613,526 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032634.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00300 AC: 456AN: 152152Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00234 AC: 582AN: 248672Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00236 AC XY: 319AN XY: 135078
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00477 AC: 6975AN: 1461256Hom.: 25 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00460 AC XY: 3345AN XY: 726980
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00299 AC: 456AN: 152270Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00238 AC XY: 177AN XY: 74456
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
- -
- -
PIGO: BP4, BS2 -
- -
Hyperphosphatasia with intellectual disability syndrome 2 Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at