Menu
GeneBe

rs149202766

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 1P and 6B. PP3BP4_ModerateBS2

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.2395C>T(p.Arg799Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000252 in 1,598,362 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R799Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 9 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 missense

Scores

13
4
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:5B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.73
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 10: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Dann, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, PrimateAI, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster, phyloP100way_vertebrate was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07591587).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 9 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2395C>T p.Arg799Trp missense_variant 14/15 ENST00000265849.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.2395C>T p.Arg799Trp missense_variant 14/151 NM_000535.7 P3P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00139
AC:
208
AN:
149538
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000540
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000119
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000512
AC:
122
AN:
238072
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000387
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
129350
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000661
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000336
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000380
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000342
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000134
AC:
194
AN:
1448722
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000133
AC XY:
96
AN XY:
720896
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000482
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000234
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000281
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000117
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00140
AC:
209
AN:
149640
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00193
AC XY:
141
AN XY:
72880
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000563
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000119
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000422
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00123
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00142
AC:
6
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000122
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000158
AC:
19

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:5Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 20, 2021DNA sequence analysis of the PMS2 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.2395C>T, in exon 14 that results in an amino acid change, p.Arg799Trp. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.31% in the Latino/Admixed American subpopulation including one homozygous individual (dbSNP rs149202766). The p.Arg799Trp change affects a highly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the PMS2 protein that is known to be functional. The p.Arg799Trp substitution appears to be deleterious using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). This sequence change has been identified in individuals evaluated for Lynch syndrome, in an individual with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and in individuals assessed for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (PMID: 28449805, 28528518, 24072394, 2648339). Due to insufficient evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Arg799Trp change remains unknown at this time. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 02, 2023Variant summary: PMS2 c.2395C>T (p.Arg799Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the MutL, C-terminal, dimerisation domain (IPR014790) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00051 in 238072 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0031 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Furthermore, the variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.001391 in 149538 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.01181 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD (v3) database, including 9 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD (v3) database is approximately 107-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PMS2 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00011), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. This observation needs to be cautiously considered due to the possibility of the PMS2 pseudogene being captured, although the observation of at least 9 homozygotes, decreases the likelihood of a pseudogene artefact. c.2395C>T has been reported in the literature in sequencing studies of individuals affected with pancreatic cancer, Lynch Syndrome and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (e.g. Cock-Rada_2017, Hu_2016, Li_2020, Oliver_2019, Sunga_2017, Yurgelun_2017, Zahary_2014). Specifically, Zahary_2014 reports the variant in one suspected Lynch syndrome patient who was indicated to have absent PMS2 protein expression, although the IHC findings from MLH1 and MSH2 were not provided. Furthermore, co-occurrence and cosegregation data and MLH1 gene testing results were not reported. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in a HBOC patient (BRCA1 c.1674delA, p.Gly559fsX13; Cock-Rada_2017), providing additional supporting evidence for a non-pathogenic role attributed to this variant. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 26483394, 26333163, 24072394, 28135145, 28528518, 28449805, 30122538, 31391288, 31921681, 35449176). Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as VUS (n=4), likely benign (n=3) and likely pathogenic (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 04, 2022- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 02, 2021In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with a personal or family history of Lynch syndrome-related cancers, at least one of whom had tumor studies consistent with pathogenic variants in this gene (Zahary 2014, Hu 2016, Sunga 2017, Yurgelun 2017, Cock-Rada 2018, Oliver 2019, Li 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24072394, 26483394, 26798439, 28135145, 26333163, 28528518, 30979843, 30122538, 31391288, 31921681, 28449805) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 07, 2023In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs:35449176 (2022), 33471991 (2021), https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/PMS2, 31921681 (2019), 28528518 (2017)), colorectal cancer (PMIDs: 28135145 (2017), 28449805 (2017), 24072394 (2014)), and pancreatic cancer (PMID: 26483394 (2015)), as well as in unaffected individuals in a large breast cancer association study (PMIDs: 33471991 (2021), https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/PMS2). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0031 (108/34802 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 19, 2022This missense variant replaces arginine with tryptophan at codon 799 of the PMS2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with Lynch syndrome or Lynch syndrome-associated cancers (PMID: 24072394, 28135145, 28449805), breast/ovarian cancer (PMID: 28528518, 31921681 33471991), or pancreatic cancer (PMID: 26483394) This variant has been identified in 119/233620 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) and in multiple healthy control individuals (PMID: 33471991). This observed population allele frequency is not considered reliable since the gnomAD dataset does not disambiguate possible interference from homologous sequences in the PMS2CL pseudogene. The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 13, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Ovarian cancer Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, flagged submissionclinical testingLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityJan 01, 2022- -
Lynch syndrome 4;C5399763:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.77
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.12
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.40
Cadd
Pathogenic
33
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.42
T;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.72
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.89
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D;.;D;.;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.45
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.076
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.95
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.6
H;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;N
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.87
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.7
D;D;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.98
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;.;.;.;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;.;.;D;D
Vest4
0.94
MVP
0.97
MPC
3.3
ClinPred
0.16
T
GERP RS
3.7
Varity_R
0.88
gMVP
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149202766; hg19: chr7-6017269; API