rs149217423

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.1336A>G(p.Lys446Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000311 in 1,613,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.86

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RAD50 links:

ENSG00000283782 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000283782 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22081736).

BP6

Variant 5-132589721-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132589721-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 140939.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD50	NM_005732.4 link	c.1336A>G	p.Lys446Glu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 25	ENST00000378823.8	NP_005723.2	Q92878-1A5D6Y3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD50	ENST00000378823.8 link	c.1336A>G	p.Lys446Glu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 25	1	NM_005732.4	ENSP00000368100.4		Q92878-1
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000640655.2 link	c.1039A>G	p.Lys347Glu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 26	5		ENSP00000491596.2		A0A1W2PQ90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000264

AC:

AN:

250474

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000288

AC XY:

AN XY:

135488

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000124

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000557

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000320

AC:

467

AN:

1460746

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000288

AC XY:

209

AN XY:

726736

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000375

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000409

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000223

AC:

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000426

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000313

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000223

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000233

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000395

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jan 06, 2022	Observed in individuals with breast cancer and in an unaffected female with a family history of ovarian and other cancers who also carried a pathogenic variant in RAD51C (Haiman 2013, Damiola 2014, Lu 2015, Schoolmeester 2017); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Variants in candidate genes are classified as variants of uncertain significance in accordance with ACMG guidelines (Richards 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24894818, 26689913, 26787654, 28709830, 23555315) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Oct 31, 2024	The RAD50 c.1336A>G (p.Lys446Glu) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 24894818 (2014)) and ovarian cancer (PMID: 30441849 (2018)). This variant has also been reported in an unaffected individual who also carried a gross exonic deletion in the RAD51C gene (PMID: 28709830 (2017)). In a large breast cancer association study, this variant was found in individuals with breast cancer cases as well as in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/RAD50)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0014 (36/26090 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Baylor Genetics	Mar 27, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics	May 23, 2017	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Nov 15, 2024	This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 446 of the RAD50 protein (p.Lys446Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs149217423, gnomAD 0.05%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and ovarian cancer (PMID: 24894818, 26689913, 30441849). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 140939). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt RAD50 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Nov 24, 2020	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Oct 19, 2018

Variant summary: RAD50 c.1336A>G (p.Lys446Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00026 in 276328 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 4-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RAD50 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (6.3e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. The variant, c.1336A>G, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, without strong evidence for pathogenicity (Damiola_2014, Haiman_2013, Lu_2015, Schoolmeester_2017, Young_2016). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (RAD51C 5'UTR through exon 5 deletion; Schoolmeester_2017), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.78

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.14

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.080

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.22

.;.;.;T;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.74

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.73

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Benign

0.84

.;.;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.046

MetaRNN

Benign

0.22

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.4

.;.;.;M;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.70

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.3

.;.;.;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.31

Sift

Uncertain

0.018

.;.;.;D;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.44

.;.;.;T;D

Polyphen

1.0

.;.;.;D;.

Vest4

0.81

MVP

0.58

ClinPred

0.42

GERP RS

5.5

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.38

gMVP

0.71

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over