rs149258400

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.2173C>T(p.Pro725Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00088 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00087 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:16O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.47

Variant links:

Genes affected

PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

PTCH1 links:

LOC100507346 (HGNC:):

LOC100507346 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009658694).

BP6

Variant 9-95468828-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95468828-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 41654.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-95468828-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00102 (155/152274) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00203 (31/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00147. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 75 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 155 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PTCH1	NM_000264.5 link	c.2173C>T	p.Pro725Ser	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 24	ENST00000331920.11	NP_000255.2	Q13635-1
PTCH1	NM_001083603.3 link	c.2170C>T	p.Pro724Ser	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 24	ENST00000437951.6	NP_001077072.1	Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PTCH1	ENST00000331920.11 link	c.2173C>T	p.Pro725Ser	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 24	5	NM_000264.5	ENSP00000332353.6		Q13635-1
PTCH1	ENST00000437951.6 link	c.2170C>T	p.Pro724Ser	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 24	5	NM_001083603.3	ENSP00000389744.2		Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00103

AC:

156

AN:

152156

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00148

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00334

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000915

AC:

230

AN:

251484

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00101

AC XY:

137

AN XY:

135914

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000694

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00138

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00244

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000865

AC:

1265

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000910

AC XY:

662

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000765

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000301

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000749

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000842

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00174

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00102

AC:

155

AN:

152274

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00101

AC XY:

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00149

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.00104

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000888

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00135

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00105

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000857

AC:

104

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00256

EpiControl

AF:

0.00243

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:16Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:6

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

PTCH1: BS1 -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:4Other:1

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 18, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 03, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Gorlin syndrome

Benign:2

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 11, 2022

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

May 03, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

PTCH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 24, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Holoprosencephaly 7

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.097

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.33

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.28

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Benign

0.84

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.27

T;.;.;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.30

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.048

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.92

D;.;D;D;.;.;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.059

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0097

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.56

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.55

N;.;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.64

PROVEAN

Benign

0.18

N;N;N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.30

Sift

Benign

0.73

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.80

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.012

B;B;B;B;B;B;B

Vest4

0.34

MVP

0.27

MPC

0.55

ClinPred

0.012

GERP RS

4.8

Varity_R

0.062

gMVP

0.56

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over